Skip to content

Wrong and More Confident: A Field Experiment on Language Models Taking a Graduate Economics Exam

· 0 citations · 28 references

TL;DR

The red herring corrupts the reasoning, and leads a model to rate a problem as easier, not harder, than its clean version, even as it answers that problem wrong more often.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Reasoning Concentrates Errors, and Self-Consistency Never Notices

It is shown that reasoning concentrates a model's errors: the probability that two independently drawn wrong answers coincide rises in all ten dataset-scale comparisons, and in nine of nine after restricting both arms to the problems each gets wrong.

Asaad Althoubi · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Does a model's stated reason for rejecting a candidate do any work?

Asked to choose between candidates and explain the choice, a language model often rejects a rival by naming a fact its profile lacks: no director, no date of death. That sentence is a claim about the text in front of the model, and it can be tested without any judge. We insert a real corpus sentence stating the named f...

Archit Rastogi · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Aug 2026

Thinking in a Low-Resource Language: What SFT Builds, What RL Fixes, What Accuracy Cannot See

Take three frontier mixture-of-experts models (Alibaba, OpenAI, NVIDIA; 3.6-4.0B active parameters each) and fine-tune them to reason in a low-resource language. On accuracy benchmarks almost nothing happens, and the benchmark itself is noise at this scale: changing only the random seed moves the score by 7.7 points, m...

Ayoub Kirouane, Christos Petrocheilos · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Knowing, and Saying It Only When Asked: LLM Endognostics and the Schizognosis of Minerva-7B

Evaluating an aligned language model by reading its answers assumes the answers carry the distinction the evaluator cares about. We introduce LLM endognostics, a white-box internal auditing framework designed to extract and causally manipulate latent knowledge within the residual stream. Applied to Minerva-7B-Instruct-...

Fabrizio Davide, Francesco Collova · 1 citation
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Beyond the Sycophancy Score: How Task, Model, and Pressure Shape LLM Yielding

Large language models (LLMs) often abandon a correct answer, or endorse a user's position, once the user pushes back. This behavior, called sycophancy, is usually reported as a single rate per model, which says little about when it happens or how a user can avoid it. We study the conditions that produce it with 103,939...

Guang Yang, Homa Hosseinmardi, Feng-Chen Liu et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

New Asymmetries

This article argues that “AI use” is too blunt a category for judging what happens when a student writes a humanities paper with a large language model. Taking the most intensive case, a paper built with AI from research to final review, it follows the changing relation between student, model, sources, and draft. In re...

Joshua Leonardo Lupowitz · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.