Aug 2026· Swiss Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine· 0 citations
TL;DR
This Educational Editorial & Practical Guide translates CARE-radiology, CARE, ICMJE, COPE, the 2024 Declaration of Helsinki and CRediT into a 12-step SJORANM workflow for authors, reviewers and editors to create an educational, internally consistent and independently verifiable case report before peer review.
Abstract
Radiological case reports are most useful when they enable readers to reconstruct the clinical question, inspect the decisive original imaging evidence, follow the diagnostic reasoning, and evaluate how the diagnosis was confirmed and what happened afterwards. CARE-radiology provides the radiology-specific reporting framework. This Educational Editorial & Practical Guide translates CARE-radiology, CARE, ICMJE, COPE, the 2024 Declaration of Helsinki and CRediT into a 12-step SJORANM workflow for authors, reviewers and editors.
SJORANM requires original diagnostic radiological images as primary evidence and a dedicated Patient Perspective section (or a transparent explanation if unobtainable). Pathology is preferred when clinically relevant and available but is not mandatory when another credible reference standard exists. The framework distinguishes external reporting requirements, good scientific practice and journal-specific policy. Accompanying tools include author and reviewer checklists, a technical pre-check, standardised decision-letter modules and a CARE-radiology crosswalk. The aim is an educational, internally consistent and independently verifiable case report before peer review.
We developed a national questionnaire to assess radiology reports (RR) physicians’ reading habits and identify their expectations towards RR, focusing on CT and MRI reports. An anonymized 20-item questionnaire was nationally distributed in France via practice and hospital mailing lists and one social media group, and i...
Yasmine Kassab, Matthieu Bailly, Sixtine Brabant et al.· Insights into Imaging· 0 citations
Structured prompting improves detection of interpretation and section-consistency errors across seven models and consistently enhances LLM-based error detection, closing the gap between open-source and commercial models and offering a pathway for privacy-preserving, on-premises QA.
Jia Li, Zi-Chun Zhou, Yan-Tao Niu et al.· European Radiology Experimen...· 0 citations
This paper quantifies the sensitivity of established evaluation metrics to variations in reporting practices and introduces a radiologist-informed taxonomy of variations in radiology reporting practice and a method (ReRef) that rewrites reference reports along the axes of the authors' taxonomy while preserving clinical...
Daniel P. Jeong, Charles Q. Li, H. Hosseiny et al.· 0 citations
This review examines how AI is reshaping radiology workflow, summarises clinically relevant applications across imaging modalities, evaluates evidence regarding diagnostic performance and operational efficiency, and discusses implementation, ethics, regulation, workforce, economic, and equity-related considerations.
Neelam Rao Bharti, Deeksha Jaiswal, Nidhi Goswami et al.· Genetics and Molecular Resea...· 0 citations
The IMAGE Statement provides a structured framework intended to improve completeness, transparency, reproducibility, educational value, and ethical reporting of clinical image publications across healthcare disciplines.
H. J. Ribeiro, H. Morais, F. Cáceres-Loriga et al.· Methods and Protocols· 0 citations
The radiology patient-centered outcome space is sufficiently well-characterized to justify dedicated PROM development, yet no broadly applicable instrument has demonstrated content validity for routine adult diagnostic radiology, providing the empirical and conceptual foundation for the proposed CLARITY PROM program.
Rakhshan Kamran, Danial Aminaei, Benjamin Rehany et al.· Academic Radiology· 2 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.