Skip to content
Open access

Towards Agentic Support for the Chaos Engineering of Cyber-Physical Systems

2026 · International Conference on Software and Data Technologies · pp. 262-269 · 0 citations · 25 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This paper investigates how AI can assist the systematic design of chaos engineering experiments for Cyber-Physical Systems and shows how the different phases of chaos engineering can be adapted to CPS contexts and how they can be effectively and efficiently supported by a multi-agent architecture.

Abstract

: Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) require rigorous robustness testing, yet this activity remains largely manual and dependent on expert knowledge. Chaos engineering provides a structured methodology through characterizing the system, defining metrics, formulating hypotheses, and planning perturbations. However, it lacks systematic support. This paper investigates how AI can assist the systematic design of chaos engineering experiments for CPS. We show how the different phases of chaos engineering can be adapted to CPS contexts and how they can be effectively and efficiently supported by a multi-agent architecture, with GPT-4o mini powered phase-specific agents providing detailed justifications while keeping a human analyst in the loop either at the phase level or through global iterations. Preliminary results from three industrial case studies show significant benefits from AI assistance, with around 50% efficiency gains in the design phase while improving coverage. Beyond the CPS domain, we also discuss applicability to other target domains (e.g. industrial or financial systems) and properties like secure chaos engineering.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

Agentic AI for Safety-critical Multi-drone Systems: Challenges and Opportunities

It is argued that agentic AI should be approached as a socio-technical design problem, where interfaces, oversight mechanisms, and evaluation practices are as critical as algorithms.

Timothy Merritt, Alejandro Jarabo-Peñas, Juan Bravo-Arrabal et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Cognitive cyber-physical systems: integrating intelligence, adaptation, and real-time decision-making

Cognitive cyber-physical systems (CCPS) represent a critical inflection point in the evolution of intelligent engineering systems, where computation, learning, and physical interaction are no longer separated but fused within a continuous adaptive loop. This editorial positions CCPS as the intermediate layer between fo...

Tole Sutikno · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

A Review of Fault Diagnosis of Model-based Mechatronic Systems

This comprehensive review systematically categorizes these methodologies into qualitative approaches—including abstraction hierarchies, fault tree models, signed directed graphs, and fuzzy logic formulations—and quantitative mathematical techniques, encompassing analytical redundancy, parity spaces, Kalman filtering fr...

R. M. T. C. B. Ekanayake, T. Bandara · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

A-CPES: A Reference Framework for Agentic AI in Cyber-Physical Energy Systems

It is argued the loop is indivisible, tune where and how tightly it may close, state eight structural failure modes as falsifiable predictions, and specify six governance modules that rebuild the authorization frame until it covers the loop, before the loop starts turning.

Xiao-Yu Zhang, Qiu-Ye Sun, Jiachen Xu et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Strategic Evaluation of Planning Strategies for LLM Agents in Cyber-Physical Systems

A controlled, physics-grounded benchmark built around planning-induced control trajectories: the ordered planning operations and directives through which an execution architecture acts on other agents and the physical process is introduced.

J. de Curtò, I. de Zarzà · 1 citation
Open access Sep 2026

Automation Efficiency in Cyber-Physical Systems: Interaction Between Technical Performance and Algorithmic Intelligence

The performance of a cyber-physical system cannot be judged reliably from a single engineering variable. In the investigated micro-CPS, response time, communication latency and throughput describe the technical layer, whereas prediction accuracy captures the contribution of the learning component. The present paper exa...

Iliyan Vasilev · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.