Abstract Regulatory concern over human exposure to chemical mixtures has intensified, as individuals are continuously exposed to multiple chemical substances from various sources. Historically, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) assesses risks based on individual chemicals or expected co‐occurring groups of chemical substances. Recognizing the need for comprehensive methodology, EFSA and the European Commission (EC) initiated in 2021 the gradual implementation of cumulative risk assessment (CRA) for dietary exposure to mixtures of pesticide residues. To facilitate CRA implementation, the Monte Carlo Risk Assessment (MCRA) platform, developed by Wageningen University & Research (WUR, Biometris) for the Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), was selected as CRA tooling based on its potential to be transparent, accessible and fit‐for‐purpose. In the third Framework Partnership Agreement (FPA3; 2021–2026) between EFSA and RIVM, MCRA has been continuously improved in functionality and interoperability. Additionally, standard regulatory actions (SRAs) were developed to provide user‐friendly access to agreed‐upon methodologies and to simplify CRA execution for regulatory governmental users. This report details enhancements to four SRAs for retrospective and prospective CRA, achieved during the final year of FPA3 (Specific Agreement 4). In short, SRAs for prospective CRA were updated to reflect methodology developed by EFSA, which now include several sensitivity analyses. Furthermore, all SRAs include batch assessment options assessing multiple (selected) populations in one run, updated data needed to perform the calculations, and refinements of the user interface.
Five key recommendations for future health risk assessments are concluded, prioritizing PFAS; improving analytical methods; promoting generation of robust data and data gap filling; promoting open science, including the development of shared data infrastructure and cross-institutional knowledge exchange; and strengthen...
J. Kowalczyk, Klaus Abraham, Christina August et al.· Archives of Toxicology· 0 citations
Intensifying livestock, poultry and aquaculture production in Bangladesh has been accompanied by unregulated antimicrobial and persistent organochlorine pesticide use, yet no national synthesis has linked residue occurrence in animal-source foods (ASF) to consumer health risk. This study aimed to pool the prevalence an...
M. Al Fattah, Md. Ahsan Habib· Journal of Food Protection· 0 citations
BACKGROUND
Plant protection products (PPPs) are essential tools for crop protection, but their regulatory framework in the European Union (EU) has evolved significantly with Regulation (EC) no. 1107/2009, which harmonized approval criteria and strengthened safety requirements. In parallel, increasing policy pressure li...
M. Fidanza, M. Mollari, Maria Teresa Cerasa et al.· Pest Management Science· 0 citations
Dietary exposure to pesticide mixtures is recognized as an important food safety challenge worldwide, particularly in countries with intensive agricultural production. Regulatory monitoring programs focus primarily on compliance with maximum residue limits (MRLs), whereas cumulative exposure to pesticide mixtures remai...
Gabriel Henrique Savietto, Ana Beatriz Nascimento da Silva, Pedro Henrique Da Silveira Neves et al.· Foods· 0 citations
Pesticides showing neurotoxic effects, including organophosphates, pyrethroids, and N-methyl carbamates, are widely used in agriculture. Human biomonitoring (HBM) integrates exposure from multiple sources and routes by measuring pesticide levels in human biological samples. This study applied a novel MRA methodology us...
P. Palmont, Madeline Carsique, K. Angeli et al.· Environment International· 0 citations