Skip to content
Review Open access

Mapping the generative era: a bibliometric and specialty-focused analysis of large language models in healthcare

Aug 2026 · Visual Computing for Industry, Biomedicine, and Art · Vol 9 · 0 citations · 36 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Large language models research in healthcare is expanding rapidly with distinct specialty-specific trajectories, and interpreting these trajectories using the DECIDE-AI framework clarifies low-risk near-term applications and monitoring priorities, providing a specialty-aware baseline to support the safe, equitable, and regulation-aligned adoption of LLMs in clinical practice.

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have been rapidly adopted in healthcare since 2022; however, field-level trends and specialty differences remain poorly characterized. This study aims to map the research landscape of LLMs in healthcare and generate comparative specialty profiles through a bibliometric analysis using the Web of Science Core Collection (2015–2025), including English-language articles and reviews analyzed for publication and citation trends, leading countries, institutions, authors, journals, co-citation networks, and keyword structures with VOSviewer and CiteSpace, with sub-analyses for medicine, general and internal; surgery; and radiology, nuclear medicine and medical imaging. Of the 2226 articles included, the annual output increased from four publications in 2022 to 1327 in 2025, yielding a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 592.26%; the United States of America contributed 43.5% of the publications, followed by China (14.3%), Germany (9.2%), Turkey (9.0%), and England (6.8%); the publications for each specialty were surgery (31.7%), medicine, general and internal (24.2%), and radiology, nuclear medicine and medical Iimaging (13.0%), with the last demonstrating the fastest 2023–2024 growth (CAGR 265%); and the collaboration networks were United States of America-centered, with dense trans-Atlantic ties. LLM research in healthcare is expanding rapidly with distinct specialty-specific trajectories, and interpreting these trajectories using the DECIDE-AI (developmental and exploratory clinical Iinvestigations of decision support systems driven by artificial intelligence) framework clarifies low-risk near-term applications and monitoring priorities, providing a specialty-aware baseline to support the safe, equitable, and regulation-aligned adoption of LLMs in clinical practice.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Sep 2026

Mapping the global landscape of artificial intelligence in pancreatic cancer research

Artificial intelligence research in pancreatic cancer is growing rapidly and becoming increasingly multidisciplinary, although productivity and collaboration remain uneven.

Pegah Rashidian, A. Smerat, Mohammad Ahmar Khan et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Bibliometric mapping and evolutionary logic of large language models reshaping medical education 2022–2026

In recent years, Large Language Models (LLMs) have been widely applied in medical education and clinical practice, playing an important role in promoting the digital transformation of medical education. The application of LLMs in the field of medical education has shifted from initial functional validation to technolog...

Xinliao Ling, Chengliang Wang · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Bibliometrics and visualization analysis

Background: As the prevalence of diabetes rises, diabetic kidney disease (DKD) has become a leading cause of end-stage renal disease. Big data analysis aids in DKD prediction, diagnosis, and personalized treatment. This bibliometric study summarizes the current research status and hotspots in big data-driven DKD resear...

Tingting Ding, Shang Li, Qing-Lin Guo et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

The top 100 cited papers in AI and Healthcare: trends, collaborations, and key contributions

This study performed a bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most cited papers on artificial intelligence (AI) and its applications in health and medicine. Data was retrieved from the Scopus database in December 2024, focusing on papers published between 2001 and 2024. The search string included terms such as "artificia...

Antonia Adeublena de Araújo Monteiro, C. A. Leite dos Santos, Wassem Hassan et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Structural biases in digital health intervention and health equity research: a bibliometric knowledge graph analysis (2015–2025)

Objective This study systematically analyzed the knowledge structure, evolution patterns, and structural biases in the intersection of digital health interventions, patient engagement/adherence, and health equity from 2015 to 2025. Methods We searched Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, and PubMed. We included 4,67...

Sheng-Tao Li, Zhong-Yue Li, Cheng Chen et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Citation reliability of frontier large language models in medical writing and its automated verification

Large language models are increasingly used to draft medical manuscripts, yet their citations are unreliable and clinicians lack a validated way to verify them, so LLM-generated citations require identifier-level verification, and CoVe provides it at expert-level accuracy.

R. Shin, J.-M. Lee, J. Park et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.