Aug 2026· Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility· 0 citations· 95 references
Abstract
Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance serves not only as a response to urgent climate risks but also as a strategic tool for sustainable value creation. However, the rise in greenwashing suggests gaps in existing governance frameworks. This study examines the Fair Competition Review System (FCRS), a policy aimed at mitigating administrative monopolies by emphasizing market mechanisms. Unlike prior research that focuses primarily on firm‐level factors or macroeconomic interventions, this study situates FCRS within the framework of new institutional economics, constructing a causal chain from institutional pressures to corporate responses. Empirical results demonstrate that the FCRS significantly drives ESG behavior. Mechanism analysis identifies three key pathways: stimulation of green innovation, reduction of financing costs, and optimization of income distribution, each grounded in reduced institutional transaction costs. Further analysis underscores the importance of synergistic governance and highlights several factors that enhance policy effectiveness, including equity incentive systems, audit committees, regional rule‐of‐law environments, and digital infrastructure. A particularly novel finding is that identical external institutional pressures can lead to both substantive ESG implementation and strategic brownwashing, a phenomenon previously underexplored. This study extends the scope of institutional economics and refines the framework for understanding ESG performance drivers. Practically, it offers policymakers and enterprise leaders a roadmap for leveraging institutional pressures to achieve sustainable competitive advantages.
Sustainable development is increasingly reshaping corporate strategies, particularly in emerging markets such as India, where environmental, social, and governance (ESG) integration has become pivotal for long‐term value creation. This study examines the impact of ESG performance on firm outcomes for Nifty 500 firms...
Rizwana Khurshid, A. Islam· Business Strategy & Deve...· 0 citations
Corporate sustainability requires firms to balance financial performance and social responsibilities, yet whether institutional support policies generate consistent sustainability outcomes remains unclear. This study exploits China’s industrial–financial cooperation (IFC) pilot policy as a quasi-natural experiment, usi...
Wen-Qing Du, Hong-Mei Wen· Sustainability· 0 citations
This study examines the relationship between corporate environmental performance (CEP) and corporate financial performance (CFP) under China's evolving environmental policy regime. Using a panel dataset of 1,312 Chinese A‐share listed firms from 2010 to 2023, we find a significant negative association between CEP and...
Lei Zhang, M. Arunachalam, Zhuoan Feng· Business Strategy and the En...· 0 citations
Although environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors have gained increasing prominence in the formulation of corporate strategies, analysis of investments, and financial decision-making, there is still no consensus about the influence of good ESG performance on corporate value despite the large body of research...
S. Thasneem, Md Kassim Aza Azlina· International Journal Of Rec...· 0 citations
This study examines how coverage by environmental, social, and governance (ESG) rating agencies influences executive pay structures. We find that when a firm begins to be rated by ESG agencies, its executive compensation becomes more sensitive to ESG performance and less sensitive to traditional financial performance...
Xiao Zeng, Shu-Fang Lai, Albert Tsang· Accounting Horizons· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.