Skip to content
Review Open access

Implementation Leadership in Evidence‐Based Practice in Healthcare: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Aug 2026 · Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing · Vol 23 · 0 citations · 31 references
Medicine

TL;DR

The overall pooled mean level of implementation leadership in EBP, measured using the Implementation Leadership Scale, was 2.66, and subscale pooled means were highest for supportive leadership, followed by knowledgeable, perseverant, and proactive leadership, which highlighted the need for tailored support for managers.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Evidence‐based practice (EBP) is essential in contemporary high‐pressure healthcare environments, yet its implementation remains challenging. Despite the pivotal role of leadership, the lack of pooled quantitative evidence limits understanding of implementation leadership levels and the identification of development needs. Aim To investigate the pooled mean levels of implementation leadership in EBP among healthcare professionals and managers. Design Systematic review and meta‐analysis. Methods This systematic review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and utilized the PRISMA statement. Findings were synthesized using random‐effects meta‐analyses of mean levels. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I 2 statistic. A systematic search was conducted in November 2025 in MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest, and Medic with no date or geographical limits. Studies in English, Finnish, and Swedish were included. Results A total of 22 studies published between 2014 and 2025 across nine countries, involving 9970 participants, were included. The overall pooled mean level of implementation leadership in EBP, measured using the Implementation Leadership Scale (range 0–4), was 2.66 (95% CI: 2.49–2.83). Subscale pooled means were highest for supportive leadership (3.00, 95% CI: 2.83–3.16), followed by knowledgeable (2.78, 95% CI: 2.57–3.00), perseverant (2.77, 95% CI: 2.58–2.96), and proactive leadership (2.43, 95% CI: 2.25–2.61). Subgroup analyses showed pooled means of 2.47 (95% CI: 1.98–2.97) for managers and 2.70 (95% CI: 2.52–2.88) for professionals. Considerable heterogeneity was observed across studies. Linking Evidence to Action Strengthening implementation leadership to support EBP is needed across healthcare. Organizations should invest in structured, targeted leadership development initiatives that cultivate supportive, knowledgeable, perseverant, and especially proactive leadership behaviors, while ensuring programmes are context‐sensitive and adaptable to variability across healthcare settings. In addition, role‐based differences highlight the need for tailored support for managers that reflect the complexity and accountability of their leadership responsibilities. Trial Registration PROSPERO ID: [CRD420251241584]

Read PDF

Similar papers

Meta-analysis Open access Aug 2026

Digital health interventions for reducing occupational burnout in nurses: a systematic review and meta-analysis

DIs, particularly structured and guided web-based CBT/ACT programs, were associated with moderate reductions in occupational burnout among nurses and nursing staff and support the integration of evidence-based DHIs into broader workforce well-being strategies that combine individual support with organizational action o...

Yan-Ge Yang, Jin-Peng Wen, He-Jia Wan et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Application of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability in healthcare interventions: a scoping review and proposed reporting checklist

The Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) assesses how interventions are perceived by those who deliver and receive them. However, there has been no systematic mapping of how the framework is conceptualised, operationalised, and reported in healthcare intervention research. To examine how the TFA is used to asse...

C. Ghiglieri, B. McCullough, Rebecca H. McLeese et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

The Use of Routine Outcome Monitoring in Clinical Supervision: A Scoping Review of Empirical Evidence

ABSTRACT Routine outcome monitoring (ROM) has been recognized for its potential to enhance treatment outcomes and support decision‐making. This scoping review aimed to systematically map the empirical literature on the use of ROM in clinical and/or training supervision contexts, to summarize the main findings and to id...

Arianna Teti, G. Coco, O. Gelo et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Scoping Review on the Evidence Assessment of Interventions: A Protocol.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The assessment of evidence in health research for interventions has traditionally relied on hierarchical models that prioritize randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses. Over time, alternative models have evolved, reshaping and rebalancing sources of evidence and giving more weight to ext...

Sonja N. Kralj, J. Adams, D. Moher et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Healthcare Workers’ Perceptions of eHealth Implementation: Evidence from Systematic Review Methods

Background: The world of healthcare is increasingly adopting electronic health (eHealth) technologies as part of enhancing the quality of healthcare services. The success of its implementation is highly determined by the way in which health professionals perceive and embrace such systems. Regardless of this increased a...

J. Déry, G. S. Oladipo, E. Ugege et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.