This work investigates two representative model families, LLaVA-1.5 and Qwen2.5, and provides a token-, layer-, and head-level account of how VLMs transform object grounding into spatial relations, showing that knowing where objects are is not equivalent to knowing how they relate.
Abstract
Vision-language models (VLMs) can answer spatial questions, yet the mechanisms connecting object grounding to spatial reasoning remain poorly understood. It is underexplored whether spatial reasoning internally requires precise objects localization, or can bypass explicit localization through global layout cues. In this work, we investigate two representative model families, LLaVA-1.5 and Qwen2.5-VL, using a suite of mechanistic interpretability tools, including token ablation, layer-wise probing, attention knockout, and causal mediation analysis. We find that spatial relation prediction follows a staged grounding-to-reasoning process in which object-aligned tokens establish coarse target-reference anchors, while precise bounding-box boundaries are not required. Positional information becomes decodable before relation decisions emerge, and a small set of attention heads mediates the causal effects of both localization and spatial reasoning. The two tasks share early grounding-related processing but ultimately rely on partially distinct specialized pathways. Through rigorous experiments, we provide a token-, layer-, and head-level account of how VLMs transform object grounding into spatial relations, showing that knowing where objects are is not equivalent to knowing how they relate.
Vision-language models are known to encode spatial information in their hidden states, yet often fail to use it when answering. However, it remains unclear when and where this encoded information reaches the answer. We address this with direction patching, a class-conditioned causal intervention applied across layers, token positions, and prompt formats. Using spatial-ID directions constructed following prior encoding evidence, we find that causal influence on answer logits emerges only at mid-to-deep depths. Text chain-of-thought suppresses immediate object-word argmax-level transport in most models, while visually grounded prompts keep it open. Positive target-logit gain can remain below the argmax threshold, and transport can re-emerge at the final prefix token or at the answer step in deeper layers. Across the ten VLMs we study, these local effects form descriptive transport patterns. Complementary experiments characterize how these patterns shift across datasets, attributes, and encoding amplitudes. Together, these results reframe the encoding-grounding gap as a problem of conditional transport in VLMs.
Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly used in embodied agents to interpret visual inputs, reason about spatial relationships, and make task-level decisions based on that reasoning. However, a fundamental capability mismatch remains: general VLMs can reason about the overall task but often miss the visual details that determine success, while specialist vision models can capture those details but cannot translate them into task-level decisions. In this work, we propose SpatialCLI, a framework that teaches VLMs to reason with spatial tools and progressively internalize the specialist perceptual capabilities they provide. SpatialCLI proceeds in three stages: (1) Call exposes specialist vision models as spatial tools to augment the VLM's perception; (2) Learn uses Cold-Start SFT and agentic RL to improve tool use; and (3) Internalize verbalizes successful tool-use trajectories to internalize specialist perceptual capabilities. We further introduce SpatialCLI-Bench, a 516-example benchmark for compositional perception across localization, segmentation, depth, and pose. On MindCube, SpatialCLI raises Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct from 29.3% to 84.6% with tools, surpassing GPT-5.6 Sol with tools (72.1%), while retaining 73.8% without tools after internalization.
Yang Zhou, Zixuan Huang, Sunzhu Li et al.· 0 citations
Spatial relation questions require a model to identify the queried subject and object before comparing their layout. Yet a VLM can recognize both entities and still answer from the wrong instance or an ambiguous global view. We ask whether making query-specific evidence explicit can mitigate this failure and propose SEER (Self-grounded Evidence for Entity-Relation Reasoning), a training-free inference-time evidence interface for frozen VLMs. SEER hides candidate relations during pair localization, constructs a query-specific view with explicit subject/object roles, and retains the full image and sparse box geometry as complementary evidence. For relation-choice protocols with exact inverse support, an optional refinement swaps the entity roles and changes the forward decision only when exactly one visual state obeys the corresponding inverse relation. On an image-disjoint GQA-Train900 test frozen before model scoring, SEER pools to +3.94 [2.17,5.72] over Full; the gain remains positive under label-independent grounding-order counterbalancing and on the 535 rows whose entity names are unique. The unchanged protocol yields +4.35 to +11.79 on all 2,434 filtered EmbSpatial pair-relation questions across three models. Matched controls separate local refocus from role-explicit conditioning. These results establish query-specific evidence construction as the principal intervention, with reciprocal consistency as a smaller protocol-specific refinement.
Feixiang Liu, Likun Wang, Qiang Qiu et al.· 0 citations
Compositional visual question answering requires Vision-Language Models (VLMs) to execute multiple reasoning operations like object selection, spatial relation resolution, and attribute verification. Despite strong aggregate performance, the mechanistic basis of VLM failures on this task remains underexplored. To address this gap, we analyze vision-operation misalignment in VLMs by examining how failures relate to specific reasoning operations and the internal computational pathways through which they arise and propagate. We introduce an Operation-centric mechanistic framework that decomposes VLM failures by both the reasoning operation where they originate and the internal computational pathway through which they propagate. Our analysis reveals four dominant failure modes: grounding failure, reasoning failure, attribute extraction failure, and language-prior dominance, each characterized by a distinct relationship between visual grounding strength and answer correctness. Through three complementary causal interventions applied across all transformer layers, we find that object-selection failures are associated primarily with feedforward computation, multi-step relational failures with late-layer direct attention, and attribute-extraction failures with answer-position feedforward computation. Validation on VSR further shows that single-step spatial failures are concentrated at object-position encoding, distinguishing them from multi-step relational composition. These findings reveal distinct computational bottlenecks across operation types and provide a principled basis for targeted diagnosis of VLM failures in multimedia reasoning.
Navya Gupta, Bingjie Xu, Avinash Anand et al.· 0 citations
As Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are increasingly deployed in decision-critical pipelines such as robotics, embodied AI, and safety monitoring, the opacity of their spatial judgments limits operator trust and auditability. MLLMs demonstrate strong reasoning but often struggle with fine-grained spatial understanding and object hallucination. Prior work, ByDeWay, introduced Layered-Depth-Based Prompting (LDP), a training-free framework that mitigates hallucinations by structuring prompts using monocular depth estimation. However, coarse depth layering falls short in resolving object-to-object spatial relationships within the same geometric plane, such as projective ("left of","above") and topological ("inside","touching") relations. We propose ByDeWay-V2, which integrates explicit spatial relational context alongside depth cues, expressed as human-readable predicates that serve as auditable evidence for downstream decision support. Using an open-vocabulary object detector (YOLO-World-L), our framework computes pairwise geometric relations between detected objects and injects them as structured spatial predicates into the MLLM prompt, bridging 3D scene depth and 2D spatial semantics without any training. We evaluate ByDeWay-V2 on the Visual Spatial Reasoning (VSR) and BLINK benchmarks across multiple MLLMs, with hallucination grounding assessed via POPE. On the BLINK spatial subset, ByDeWay-V2 achieves a 46 percent relative F1 improvement over LDP for Qwen2.5-VL, and recovers BLIP-Base's spatial reasoning on VSR from near-random performance to a competitive F1 of 0.53. Our lightest configuration operates under a strict 40-token context budget on CPU, showing the framework's suitability for resource-constrained, real-time decision-support settings.
Piyush Jain, Kousik Dasgupta, Rajarshi Roy et al.· 0 citations
Vision-language models have achieved impressive progress, yet they still struggle with spatial intelligence–understanding where objects are, how they relate, and how space changes across viewpoints. This limitation matters for embodied AI, autonomous driving, and spatially consistent generation. Meanwhile, rapid advances in spatially enhanced VLMs have produced a scattered literature with inconsistent terminology, methods, and evaluation practices. In this survey, we provide a comprehensive and unified overview of recent advances in spatial intelligence for VLMs. We summarize core concepts behind spatial reasoning in VLMs, analyze why spatial failures occur, and organize existing solutions into a clear framework spanning prompting-based techniques, model improvements, explicit 2D cues, 3D enrichment, and data-driven strategies. We also examine how spatial ability is currently measured and report an empirical study across 37 models and 9 representative benchmarks. Our analysis highlights current best-performing approaches, clarifies when different strategies help or fail, shows the existence of performance gaps across different evaluation datasets and reveals the potential design biases in current spatial understanding benchmarks. By consolidating evidence and outlining open challenges, this survey offers a practical roadmap for building more spatially capable VLMs. We release our
evaluation code
and maintain a curated
paper repository
to support the rapidly growing research on spatial intelligence in vision-language models.
Disheng Liu, Tuo Liang, Zhe Hu et al.· Artificial Intelligence Revi...· 6 citations
What if pathology foundation models could do more with less? GigaPath-Flash and GigaTIME-Flash cut computational demands while maintaining strong performance, opening the door to larger studies and broader exploration. The post GigaPath-Flash and GigaTIME-Flash: Toward population-scale discovery with efficient pathology foundation models appeared first on Microsoft Research.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduAug 31, 2026
With millions of users across the world, Julia has been used to conduct cutting-edge research and to design new drugs, jet engines, heat pumps, and more.