Telemedicine and artificial intelligence in family medicine practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis of barriers and enablers in routine primary care
Aug 2026· Frontiers in Digital Health· Vol 8· 0 citations· 63 references
Medicine
TL;DR
Telemedicine and AI have promising roles in strengthening family practice, particularly for access, chronic disease management, diagnostic support, and decision-making, but sustainable implementation requires attention to technological, organizational, regulatory, and human factors.
Abstract
Introduction Telemedicine and artificial intelligence (AI) are reshaping healthcare delivery, yet their integration into routine family practice remains inconsistent. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify barriers and enablers influencing the adoption of telemedicine and AI in primary care and to quantify their effects on clinical and operational outcomes. Methods This review followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251029675). Six databases—PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and IEEE Xplore—were searched from inception to March 15, 2025. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials examining telemedicine or AI implementation in family practice or primary care settings. Data extraction covered study characteristics, intervention type, outcomes, and reported barriers and enablers. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. Narrative synthesis, thematic analysis, and random-effects meta-analysis were conducted where appropriate. Results Thirteen randomized controlled trials involving more than 29,000 participants were included. Telemedicine interventions showed favorable study-level effects on chronic disease management, access to care, and patient satisfaction, although the pooled clinical effect across ten trials did not reach statistical significance. AI applications significantly improved diagnostic accuracy and clinical decision-making, with a pooled log odds ratio of 0.73 (95% CI: 0.46–1.00). Key enablers included clinician engagement, reliable digital infrastructure, leadership support, training, and workflow integration. Major barriers included technological interoperability, clinician skepticism, patient digital literacy limitations, privacy concerns, and uncertain reimbursement or governance frameworks. Discussion Telemedicine and AI have promising roles in strengthening family practice, particularly for access, chronic disease management, diagnostic support, and decision-making. Sustainable implementation requires attention to technological, organizational, regulatory, and human factors, alongside targeted training, policy support, and integration into routine primary care workflows.
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being integrated into healthcare
systems to support clinical decision-making, improve patient safety, enhance quality of
care, and optimize healthcare service delivery. Despite rapid technological development,
evidence regarding the real-world impact of AI on hea...
Amani Mahdi Al-Habib, Manal Adnan Alsada, Zahra Ali Al Yagoob et al.· European Journal of Prosthod...· 0 citations
Objectives The global rise in diabetes highlights the need for innovative healthcare solutions. This scoping review is aimed at identifying and categorizing patient‐reported facilitators and barriers influencing the use of telehealth consultations among people living with diabetes. Methods A systematic scoping review w...
Mahsa Fadaie Fini, T. Shafaghat, Mahdi Radabadi et al.· International Journal of Tel...· 0 citations
Background/Objectives: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into teleconsultation, but its effects on clinician performance remain uncertain. We assessed whether clinician-facing AI improves diagnostic accuracy, reduces referrals or testing, and increases clinician confidence compared with standard t...
Yaslam Ba Srada, Bobakr Bawazir, Saad Mohammad Aghi et al.· Clinics and Practice· 0 citations
BACKGROUND
AI-enabled clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are being used in primary care, but their effects on clinical decisions and patient outcomes remain uncertain.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to synthesize real-world evaluations of clinician-facing AI-enabled CDSS in primary care and assess evidence for diag...
Yash Jain, Di-Shan Wu, Zhong Wang· Journal of Medical Internet...· 0 citations
Aims The aim of this study was to systematically review the evidence for the effectiveness of mHealth self-care management in patients with Heart Failure (HF). Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINAHL, CNKI, CBM, Wan...
Ting-Ru Wu, Ying Jia, Ruo-Han Fu et al.· Frontiers in Cardiovascular...· 0 citations
Background/Objectives: Polypharmacy may increase the risk of medication discrepancies, drug–drug interactions, potentially inappropriate prescribing, nonadherence, adverse drug events, and avoidable healthcare use. Telemedicine may improve access to medication review, particularly for older adults, people with multimor...
Bobakr Bawazir, Yaslam Ba Srada, Saad Mohammad Aghi et al.· Clinics and Practice· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.