Aug 2026· Lentera Negeri· Vol 7, pp. 1353-1362· 0 citations· 26 references
Abstract
Advances in forensic genetic technology have made genetic data an important tool in modern law enforcement, particularly for identifying perpetrators and solving cold cases. In Indonesia, the use of genetic data has a normative basis in Indonesian National Police Chief Regulation No. 1 of 2024 on the National Criminal Information Center (Piknas), which classifies DNA data as part of criminal perpetrator profiles. However, the regulation remains general and administrative, providing limited provisions on DNA collection, use, privacy protection, and data destruction. This study analyzes the regulation of genetic data use in Indonesia by comparing it with the United States Department of Justice Interim Policy on Forensic Genetic Genealogical DNA Analysis and Searching (2019). Using a normative juridical method with statutory and comparative approaches, the study finds that the DOJ policy provides more comprehensive safeguards, including case requirements, privacy protections, informed consent, restrictions on arrests based solely on genetic associations, and data destruction mechanisms. The study also examines the Draft Law on One Data Indonesia (RUU SDI), which provides general principles of data interoperability and security but does not specifically regulate forensic genetic data. Relevant provisions in Law No. 17 of 2023 on Health, Government Regulation No. 28 of 2024, Law No. 27 of 2022 on Personal Data Protection, Law No. 1 of 2023 on the Criminal Code, Law No. 20 of 2025, and Law No. 1 of 2026 on Criminal Procedure are also considered. The study concludes that Indonesia needs a comprehensive regulatory framework for forensic genetics that incorporates safeguards inspired by the DOJ model while remaining consistent with the national data governance framework under the RUU SDI.
The rapid advancement of genomics and biotechnology has introduced complex legal and ethical challenges, foremost among them genomic discrimination: the use of individuals' genetic traits, family medical history, or inferred genetic status to make adverse decisions in employment, insurance, access to services, or o...
F. Gourari, M. Alkrisheh, Abouelwafa Ibrahim et al.· Frontiers in Medicine· 0 citations
With over 1000 cases now resolved with the help of Forensic Investigative Genetic Genealogy (FIGG), this new tool has been shown to produce investigative leads where traditional DNA testing has not. Because of FIGG's success, state public forensic laboratories have begun to examine considerations for implementing it in...
Arielle Reich, A. Houkes, R. Woolery et al.· Forensic Science Internation...· 0 citations
This article examines the regulation of forensic DNA databases across six jurisdictions: Algeria, Botswana, Canada, Mauritius, South Africa, and the United Kingdom, through a functional comparative framework directed at a South African constitutional question. It evaluates how different systems structure inclusion, ret...
MM Ramohlale, JH Smith, K. Ehlers et al.· South African journal of cri...· 0 citations
-The increasing complexity of criminal activities has exposed significant weaknesses in Nigeria's criminal justice system, particularly the limited application of forensic genetics in criminal investigations. This paper examined the absence of genetic policing and its implications for criminal justice in Nigeria. The s...
A. Aaron, Okoru Alex Omojo· Iconic research and engineer...· 0 citations
The rapid advancement of genetic modification technologies, particularly CRISPR-Cas9 systems, synthetic biology platforms, and gain-of-function research, presents unprecedented challenges for legal frameworks designed to prevent biological crimes. This paper examines the critical intersection of biotechnology and crimi...
Hussain Alghafri· International journal of res...· 0 citations