Skip to content
Review Open access

Liquid biopsy biomarkers for cancer detection, treatment monitoring, and clinical outcome prediction

Jul 2026 · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · Vol 14 · 0 citations · 134 references
Medicine

TL;DR

The current state of the field can be framed across three tiers of evidence, with established applications, applications under prospective evaluation, and applications not yet ready for routine clinical use.

Abstract

Liquid biopsy now provides minimally invasive access to tumor-derived genomic and epigenetic information across the lung cancer continuum, and its clinical role continues to expand. This review examines that role across cancer detection (screening and diagnosis), treatment monitoring (advanced-disease genotyping, minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment, and resistance profiling at progression), and clinical outcome prediction. Plasma-based genotyping is now well established in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), while circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based MRD detection in the curative-intent setting has accumulated a substantial evidence base over the past 5 years. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) methylation, fragmentomics, and circulating tumor RNA (ctRNA) are emerging as complementary modalities, particularly when tumor shedding is low. We also consider concordance between liquid and tissue biopsies, the use of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) ctDNA in central nervous system (CNS)-involved disease, and the practical issues of cost, reimbursement, and access that shape clinical adoption. The current state of the field can be framed across three tiers of evidence, with established applications, applications under prospective evaluation, and applications not yet ready for routine clinical use. No multi-cancer early detection (MCED) test has shown a mortality benefit to date, and ctDNA-guided treatment changes in metastatic disease still lack randomized overall-survival data.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Liquid biopsy in breast cancer: current biomarker platforms and clinical applications

This review provides a comprehensive overview of the key analytes employed in liquid biopsy, including circulating tumor DNA, circulating tumor cells, microRNAs, extracellular vesicles, and protein biomarkers with particular emphasis on their translational relevance in breast cancer.

Pritam Saha Podder, Debasree Bhadra, Canio Martinelli et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Liquid Biopsy in Precision Oncology: Expanding Clinical Applications for Molecular Characterization, Disease Monitoring, and Personalized Management of Solid Tumors

Overall, liquid biopsy represents a transformative strategy that complements conventional tissue biopsy and supports more personalized, dynamic, and evidence-based management of solid tumors.

Ricardo Fernando Rincón Veloz, Ana Milena Murgas Acevedo, Gerardo Amaya Villagran et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Circulating Tumor DNA in Breast Cancer: A Liquid Biopsy Revolution for Non-Invasive Genomic Profiling and Clinical Decision-Making

Continuous technological innovation, prospective multicenter validation, standardized testing protocols, and evidence-based clinical guidelines are essential to fully integrate ctDNA into routine precision breast cancer care.

E. I. Obeagu, C. Okafor · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Liquid Biopsy for Glioblastoma: Emerging Biomarkers, Clinical Utility, Current Challenges and Future Perspectives - A Narrative Review

Liquid biopsy represents a promising complementary approach to conventional tissue pathology and neuroimaging in glioblastoma and its greatest future value may lie in longitudinal molecular monitoring and integration with MRI, radiomics, artificial intelligence, and other molecular profiling approaches.

Usha Topalkatti, Jhansi Mani Mahadeva · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

ctDNA and immune biomarker testing for molecular residual disease surveillance and immune stratification in cancer

A conceptual, hypothesis-generating framework is proposed in which ctDNA reports tumor-derived molecular signal and shedding, whereas immune assays report immune pressure and escape, which may, if prospectively validated, distinguish biologically different MRD states.

Ning Cui, H. Hao, Xiao-Feng Hu et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.