This study introduces the Physics AI-Replication framework, in which students identify challenging problems, use AI to explain underlying concepts and solutions, generate similar problems, and practice independently before reviewing answers.
Abstract
The growing use of generative AI tools among students raises an important pedagogical question: how can AI be structured to promote active learning rather than passive answer-seeking? This study introduces the Physics AI-Replication (P-A.I.R.) framework, in which students identify challenging problems, use AI to explain underlying concepts and solutions, generate similar problems, and practice independently before reviewing answers. Survey data from 39 undergraduate students in algebra-based physics indicate that nearly all participants reported improved conceptual understanding following engagement with P-A.I.R. across the semester, and self-confidence scores were consistently above the scale midpoint (mean = 7.03; range 5-9). A strong association between conceptual clarity and replication helpfulness (Spearman r = 0.582, p<0.001) supports the framework's design. Qualitative findings highlight conceptual clarification and structured problem-solving. These results suggest that P-A.I.R. offers a practical approach for integrating AI into physics learning.
Examination of undergraduate students in an operations management course who first solved a linear programming problem manually and then used GenAI on the same task shows that students can position GenAI differently within the same technical task, from receiving answers to verifying existing reasoning or seeking concep...
A. Jaiswal, Gaurav Nanda· International Journal of STE...· 0 citations
A purpose-built Problem-Level Cognitive Framework is developed that represents assessment problems along two analytically independent dimensions: the dominant reasoning required for a conceptually adequate solution—Formal, Procedural, Theoretical, or Critical—and the structural complexity of the minimal valid solution...
László Bognár, Peter Horvath, Antal Joós et al.· Education sciences· 0 citations
Abstract The rapid proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI)-driven educational interventions has generated substantial interest in their effectiveness for vocabulary acquisition; however, the existing literature presents inconsistent findings. This meta-analysis, drawing on 28 studies and integrating 55 effect siz...
Ke-Nan Gao, Xiaotong Shi, Juan Zhang· International Review of Appl...· 0 citations
A structured, seeded review of 24 focal empirical publications, finding no validated individual-level instrument in the focal corpus that tests the full combination of agent scope, permissions, recovery, state isolation, independent review, and evidence-based closure.
These findings show why AI-supported learning requires interaction records to provide a more defensible basis for AI-supported designs than self-reports.
F. Zahra, Wei Wang, Frances K. Harper et al.· 0 citations
How students interact with artificial intelligence (AI) systems in educational settings may determine whether that interaction supports or displaces critical thinking. This paper introduces two contributions. The first is the Three Paths of Student-AI Interaction, a typological framework identifying three qualitatively...
F. Zahra· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.