Skip to content
Open access

Building Trust and Social License in the UK: Driving a Sector Wide Ethical Shift in Public Engagement for Population and Administrative Data Research

Jul 2026 · International Journal of Population Data Science · Vol 11 · 0 citations
Medicine

Abstract

Use of population and administrative data has intensified ethical scrutiny around data security, representativeness, and research validity. Public trust has been weakened by data misuse, limited transparency, and poor alignment with community priorities. Existing engagement approaches are often inadequate for data-intensive environments where public roles and effective engagement remain poorly understood. In response, UK partners across disciplines and sectors established the Public Engagement in Data Research Initiative (PEDRI) and co-developed Good Practice Standards for Public Engagement in Data for Research and Statistics, alongside a public pledge. A PEDRI Frontiers meeting in June 2025 convened 60 stakeholders from government, regulation, industry, academia, community organisations, and the public. Participants compared the Standards with frameworks in their fields, examining their relevance to different publics and communities and highlighting strong alignment. Discussions focused on public engagement in statistics, administrative data, equity, diversity and inclusion, industry research, and artificial intelligence. This presentation will explore key insights, including evidence that involving the public as active partners in data use increases the relevance and impact of research while enabling communities to influence agendas and secure meaningful benefits. Definitions of “the public” vary across sectors and often require a broader, needs-based focus on what end users value. Participants mapped the Standards to existing frameworks in ethics, psychology, anthropology, political theory, and communication science. Cross-disciplinary mapping revealed trust as foundational, spanning transparency, accountability, and reciprocal benefit. The PEDRI Standards are enabling more democratic, effective, and socially accountable approaches to public engagement in data research.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access 2026

The Impact of Community-Driven Science Projects in Strengthening Public Trust in Environmental Policies

Effective environmental governance rests on two things: how willing citizens are to get involved, and how much confidence they place in the bodies that make and enforce environmental rules. Community-driven science projects, more widely known as citizen science, have become a practical way of drawing ordinary people in...

G. U. Jack, Musa Yohanna · 0 citations
Review

Experiencing performance : how engagement with public sector performance affects citizens’ trust in government and voice behaviour

In democratic societies, citizens are both the end users and the indirect stewards of public policy, meaning that citizens’ ability to hold governments to account and express their voice is key for both citizens and policymakers. In addition, governments have a need for a baseline level of trust from their citizens to...

Erasmus Häggblom · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

CITIZEN ENGAGEMENT AND EVIDENCE-BASED POLICYMAKING: LEVERAGING SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH FOR EFFECTIVE GOVERNANCE IN NIGERIA

In Nigeria, there is a significant disconnect between citizen engagement, evidence-based policymaking, and social studies research, which limits their collective impact on effective governance. Although each factor has independently influenced governance, their integration remains weak and inconsistent in the public sp...

FORTUNE OJOCHETULE YUSUFU, USMAN SHAIBU ABDULAZEEZ, MAIWADA SIMON ZAGANA et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

A quantitative systematic review of governance practices and public trust in local governments across emerging and developing contexts

Declining public trust poses a critical challenge to local administrations; however, empirical evidence regarding its antecedents remains fragmented. This systematic literature review synthesizes quantitative evidence to evaluate the relationship between core governance practices, transparency, accountability, responsi...

A. M. Abdi, A. Mulyanyuma, Julius Niringiyimana · 0 citations
2026

Politics and Power in the NGO Sector: Structural Shifts and Governance Challenges

Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) are broadly recognised as independent civil society actors that contest social injustice and advance community empowerment. Yet their autonomy and governance are increasingly compromised by political interference operating through regulatory mechanisms, funding structures, and info...

Himanshi Singh, Satender, Sunil Kumar et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Beyond methodology: A thick description of public trust in official statistics in a low-income data ecosystem — evidence from Uganda during the COVID-19 pandemic

Trust is widely acknowledged as the cornerstone of official statistics, yet most measurement frameworks in use today were developed for mature statistical systems in high-income, high-trust societies. Recent quantitative work has linked democratic political institutions to statistical capacity, but qualitative evidence...

C. Misinde, Olivia Nankinga, P. Agaba et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.