Skip to content

Graphical Design of Interpretable Architectures

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 35 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

A graphical notation for designing interpretable AI architectures, adapted from Penrose tensor notation is introduced, which gives a global view of an architecture and maps one to one onto PyTorch einsum code.

Abstract

Designing, implementing, and comparing interpretable architectures requires a formal language to represent them. The most common representations fall short in one of two ways. Symbolic equations give no global view of an architecture at a glance. Probabilistic graphical models and flowcharts do not describe actual tensor manipulations, thus hiding key insights and limiting reproducibility. To close this gap, we introduce a graphical notation for designing interpretable AI architectures, adapted from Penrose tensor notation. This graphical notation gives a global view of an architecture and maps one to one onto PyTorch einsum code. We first use this notation to describe architectures that are interpretable by construction, including concept bottlenecks, sparse probes, prototype networks, neural additive models, and mixtures of linear models. We then diagram the key architectural components of Steerling-8B, a frontier interpretable language model. The diagram yields global insights into the architecture (e.g., showing that Steerling is a residual model), a geometric interpretation of each individual operation, and a direct translation into 33 lines of PyTorch code.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Aug 2026

A Unifying Perspective on Language Model Representations: From Filler-Role Structure to Mechanistic Interpretability

This work proposes using Tensor Product Representations (TPRs) as a unifying hypothesis, and shows that TPRs can unify several prior interpretability methods: additive analogies, linear probing, sparse autoencoders, and activation patching.

Enshang Zhang, R. Thomas McCoy · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Scaling Inherently Interpretable Language Models

Steerling-8B remains competitive with open peer models trained on substantially 2-16x more compute, suggesting a different scaling paradigm: interpretability can be designed into training, and it improves with scale.

Guide Labs Team, Andreas Madsen, A. Ismail et al. · 3 citations · ⚡1
Book Open access Aug 2026

Interpretability in the Era of Large Language Models: Mechanistic Methodology, Empirical Practices, and Applications

This tutorial provides a comprehensive, end-to-end view of LLM interpretability, transitioning from microscopic neural analysis to macroscopic application and deployment, and explores how these interpretability paradigms scale and inspire the design of frontier architectures, agentic systems, and thinking models.

Wei Zhang, Zheng-Fu He, Lu-Lu Zhang et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Review Aug 2026

Tensor Methods for Language Models: From Token Representation to Training, Adaptation, Inference, Compression, and Interpretability

This survey provides a structured entry point to tensorized language models and clarifies when parameter savings can plausibly translate into memory efficiency, computational efficiency, or interpretability, and introduces a metric for the compression-realization gap between theoretical memory reduction and measured sy...

M. Tarasov, Salman Ahmadi-Asl, A. D. de Almeida et al. · 1 citation
#natural language process... Preprint Aug 2026

MURANO: Design, Run, and Reproduce Mechanistic Interpretability Experiments as Composable Pipelines

Murano is an open source framework for designing, running, and reproducing mechanistic interpretability studies of large language models, intended for researchers across disciplines and builds on existing interpretability and machine learning libraries.

Alireza Bayat Makou, Emirhan Böge, Phu Gia Hoang et al. · 0 citations
#computer vision Review Sep 2026

From Interpretability Methods to Interpretable Models

It is argued for shifting the field's focus from methods to models, along two complementary lines: existing tools let us characterize and compare what different models represent and compute, and whether a model can actually be understood by the humans who rely on it.

Julien Colin, Nuria Oliver, Thomas Serre · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 29, 2026

Who we become when we talk to machines

Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.