Skip to content
Open access

A Comparative Study of Shell Nouns in the Abstracts of Chinese Master’s Theses and Research Articles by English Expert Writers

Jul 2026 · Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences · Vol 6, pp. 23-28 · 0 citations · 3 references

Abstract

This study compares the use of shell nouns in Chinese master’s thesis abstracts and English expert research article abstracts. Based on Schmid’s (2000) definition of shell nouns and Jiang and Hyland’s (2015) functional classification, two small-scale corpora were built: a Master’s Corpus and an Expert Corpus. The findings reveal three major differences. First, experts use shell nouns significantly more frequently than master’s students. Second, experts employ a balanced distribution of lexico-grammatical constructions, with N-that accounting for 18.3%, whereas master’s students heavily rely on N-of and underuse N-that. Third, master’s students overuse event and manner nouns, while experts excel in using cognition, quality, and state nouns to express stance. These findings suggest pedagogical implications for improving Chinese master’s students’ academic writing by enhancing N-that construction training and shifting focus from process description to research evaluation.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

A Corpus-Based Metadiscourse Analysis of Hedges in Research Articles in English by Turkish-L1 and English-L1 Writers

This study aims to examine whether there are differences between native and non-native speakers of English in their use of hedges in research articles and across article sections such as the Introduction, Discussion, and Conclusion. With this purpose, a total of 200 research articles in the field of English language te...

Bilge Deniz Göçer, M. Kilic · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

A Corpus Based Study on Tense Translation in Academic Discourse: French/English Theses Abstracts as a Case Study

The analysis shows that most mismatches follow a recurring pattern in which a French passé composé reporting the students’ own methods, results, or attribution to prior research is rendered in the English present tense, blurring the distinction between the students’ specific findings and established disciplinary knowle...

Kaoutar Atarchi, Abdelkrim Elamari, Mohamed Marouane · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

The Use of Hedges and Boosters in English-Language Scientific Articles of the Late 19th and Early 20th Centuries

This paper is aimed at revealing the question about using hedges and boosters, lexico-grammatical discourse items that promote regulations of proposition force – within anglophone scientific discourse of the late 19th – early 20th century. The relevance of the research is determined by the increased interest of modern...

Елизавета Андреевна Дубовик, E. Bodnaruk · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

An Investigation into the Omission of Chinese Object Errors by Japanese and Korean Learners — An Analysis Based on the HSK Dynamic Writing Corpus

Using the HSK Dynamic Composition Corpus 3.0, this study examines 541 instances of object omission in Chinese compositions written by Japanese and Korean learners. The screened sample contains 277 instances from Japanese learners and 264 from Korean learners. Nominal objects account for 487 cases (90.02%), including 32...

Wen-Pan Guo · 0 citations
Open access 2026

Corpus-Assisted Analysis of Lexical and Grammatical Features in ESL Students’ Argumentative Essays

Argumentative writing requires ESL learners to balance clear reasoning with precise vocabulary and grammatical accuracy. This multi-layered task remains a major hurdle in language acquisition. While vocabulary and grammar are widely recognised as twin pillars of effective argumentation, research rarely examines how the...

Noor Ain Saufi, Abdul Azim Mahda, Sheela Faizura Nik Fauzi et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.