It is demonstrated that user understanding cannot be handled by simple fact retrieval, motivating the design of memory mechanisms for cross-source integration and abstraction over long-term user behavior.
Abstract
Personalized agents are increasingly applied to assist users across a wide range of tasks. Effective personalized assistance requires not only retrieving explicit facts from past interactions stored in agent memory, but also inferring abstract personal characteristics. However, existing memory benchmarks primarily evaluate whether an agent can retrieve information explicitly stated in conversational histories, failing to provide an effective assessment of deeper user understanding. In this work, we propose Setoka, a benchmark for evaluating memory-augmented personalized agents with hierarchical user understanding from heterogeneous data. Grounded in theories from cognitive and personality psychology, Setoka defines four levels of user understanding, i.e., semantic memory, episodic memory, behavior pattern, and personality trait. Moreover, to enable realistic yet privacy-preserving evaluation, we design a psychometrics-based pipeline that synthesizes diverse, coherent heterogeneous user data and queries at scale. Finally, we leverage Setoka to evaluate 3 language models combined with 5 memory systems for 10 synthetic users. Our comprehensive evaluation reveals that while existing systems perform well on semantic memory retrieval, their performance declines on episodic memory. Moreover, when dealing with behavior pattern and personality trait understanding tasks that require integrating heterogeneous and fragmented information dispersed over time, performance declines even further. These findings demonstrate that user understanding cannot be handled by simple fact retrieval, motivating the design of memory mechanisms for cross-source integration and abstraction over long-term user behavior.
Long-term agents must remember not only what is true about a user, but also how a particular agent should work with that user as their shared history evolves. Existing benchmarks primarily supervise user facts and preferences or experience reusable across users, leaving this relationship-specific agent memory implicit....
Yi-Fei Tao, Xin-Yue Zhong, Henry Hengyuan Zhao et al.· 0 citations
It is found that correctly inferring user preferences is necessary but not sufficient for task success, as execution failures in downstream web interactions remain a significant bottleneck even when agents align with the target preference.
Dong-Chan Shin, Xing Han Lù, Jiaqi Deng et al.· 0 citations
This survey develops a lifecycle-oriented view of graph-based personalized memory for LLM agents, and organizes existing studies around memory representation, memory evolution, memory retrieval, and memory evaluation.
Dac Duy Anh Nguyen, Zhangchi Qiu, Shi-Geng Chen et al.· 0 citations
This work introduces ENOUGH, a method that iteratively appends behavioral records or emits STOP to construct profiles with adaptive lengths, which consistently outperforms strong heuristic and retrieval-augmented baselines in both effectiveness and efficiency.
Ming-Hang Liu, Qiang Qiu, Yuan-Zhuo Wang et al.· 0 citations
ShareMem is introduced, a memory architecture that shares reusable experience while grounding its application in the receiving user's own preferences, and improves step success, average task success, and dialogue-macro coding scores, respectively, over matched user-local memory across all four models.
Jinming Hu, Haodong Zhao, Qi Jia et al.· 0 citations
PRAGMA is introduced, a benchmark for evaluating personalized guidance in long-term conversations and highlights the need for memory architectures that support robust conversational retrieval and memory-grounded reasoning beyond evidence recall.
H. Yu, Hyukhun Koh, Minsu Kim et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.