Skip to content
Open access

QUEST: A Simulation-Based QKD Architecture with Eight-State Time-Bin Modulation and Adaptive Homodyne–Heterodyne Detection

Aug 2026 · Information · 1 citation · 46 references

TL;DR

ModPhase-8 is introduced, a proposed QKD modulation and adaptive-receiver architecture evaluated through analytical modeling and simulation that provides an analytical security assessment under the stated collective-attack, source, channel, receiver, and trusted-device assumptions, supplemented by attack-specific analyses of intercept–resend, beam-splitting, source-side multi-photon leakage, and selected implementation-related vulnerabilities.

Abstract

Quantum key distribution (QKD) employs quantum states to generate shared cryptographic keys. An attacker interacting with the modeled non-orthogonal quantum signals can affect the monitored statistics, and hence they can be detected under the specified protocol assumptions, but this trait does not inherently authenticate the classical channel, and it does not prevent implementation side channels. In this work, we introduce ModPhase-8 (QUEST), a proposed QKD modulation and adaptive-receiver architecture evaluated through analytical modeling and simulation. Instead of using only a few quantum signal types, our system uses eight carefully designed signal variations created by adjusting the phase between two very short light pulses. The eight phase states are organized into four phase bases, each containing two antipodal states that encode one binary raw-key value. The enlarged signal set diversifies the physical representation of the key bit and changes the state-discrimination problem faced by an eavesdropper, but it does not increase the raw-key payload beyond one bit per successfully sifted signal. On the receiving side, the system adaptively switches between two measurement techniques based on the prevailing channel conditions. This adaptive detection mechanism enhances reliability and helps maintain low error rates even when the communication channel is affected by noise. We provide an analytical security assessment under the stated collective-attack, source, channel, receiver, and trusted-device assumptions, supplemented by attack-specific analyses of intercept–resend, beam-splitting, source-side multi-photon leakage, and selected implementation-related vulnerabilities. Simulation studies were conducted to examine the physical-layer and post-processing behavior of the proposed protocol under explicitly stated channel, receiver, detector, and finite-sample values. Under the adopted simulation model, ModPhase-8 maintains low error rates in the low- and moderate-noise operating regimes and exhibits favorable receiver-level robustness across the investigated channel conditions. The reported rate values are model-based performance estimates rather than rigorously certified secret-key lower bounds. In particular, Qiskit simulation does not establish a composable security proof or an optimal bound on Eve’s information for the exact eight-state time-bin ensemble. A protocol-specific numerical security analysis incorporating the homodyne–heterodyne measurement operators, post-selection, reconciliation efficiency, finite-size effects, and Eve’s Holevo information remains necessary before definitive rate comparisons can be made. ModPhase-8 should therefore be interpreted as a practically motivated receiver and modulation framework whose security-rate performance remains subject to further protocol-specific analysis.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Noise-Aware Adaptive Quantum Secure Communication Using Decoy-State Encoding

The proposed approach, a standard BB84 protocol, will first be formulated and then further enhanced with decoy-state pulse generation to handle the vulnerabilities due to multi-photon pulses, and models like depolarizing noise, amplitude damping, and measurement errors will be used as real-world quantum channels.

Podinala Sharonjyoshna, S. Surekha · 0 citations
Preprint Jul 2026

Deterministic QKD source robust against side-channel attacks

Quantum key distribution (QKD) is secure in principle, but practical security can be undermined by discrepancies between real devices and the idealized models assumed in security proofs. Source side channels, including those exploited by Trojan-horse attacks, are particularly detrimental: neglecting them compromises im...

Kiyoshi Tamaki, M. Curty, Akihiro Mizutani et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

A Loss-Robust Disturbance Certificate for Minimal-Receiver Quantum Key Distribution

By endowing the minimal-detector receiver of polarization QKD with a conclusive, loss-robust disturbance alarm, the solution lowers the hardware entry cost of security-monitored QKD, hence fostering its adoption at the cost-sensitive network edge.

R. Di Pietro · 0 citations
Review Jul 2026

QKD-Integrated Quantum Noise Stream Cipher: An Overview

Quantum Noise Stream Cipher (QNSC) has emerged as a physical-layer encryption technique that exploits quantum noise and non-orthogonal coherent-state modulation to secure optical communication. However, the security of QNSC relies exceedingly on the secrecy and freshness of its seed key. Quantum Key Distribution (QKD),...

Umesh Chandra, Avinash Kote, Neha Pathania et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

A Scalable Multi-Protocol Platform for Quantum Key Distribution Simulation with Rigorous Statistical Evaluation

Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) offers information- theoretically secure key establishment grounded in the laws of quantum physics, yet its practical reach is limited by the prohibitive cost of photonic hardware and the fragmented nature of existing simulation tools. Most simulators support only a single protocol and re...

A. Rathore, Kartick Sutradhar · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.