Aug 2026· 4 citations· ⚡ 1 influential· 35 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
Track4Action is introduced, a framework that distills this realized transition from a frozen world-centric 3D tracker into a current-observation VLA policy, and gains across simulation and physical tasks support action-aligned 3D tracker features as privileged supervision for tracker-free VLA deployment.
Abstract
Action labels tell a vision-language-action (VLA) policy which robot commands to imitate, but not how those commands change the 3D world. The aligned demonstration clip contains this missing supervision because its $K$ frame transitions record the geometry, motion, visibility, and camera change produced during the corresponding $K$ actions. We introduce Track4Action, a framework that distills this realized transition from a frozen world-centric 3D tracker into a current-observation VLA policy. During training, Track4World encodes the clip $V_{t:t+K}$ into a pooled tracker feature. Learnable track queries infer this feature from current VLA hidden states, match it in a shared space, and condition a flow-matching action head through a feature-wise gate. The tracker feature only defines the alignment target, so neither the clip nor the tracker is used at deployment. Track4Action reaches 82.3% on zero-shot LIBERO-Plus, improving the alignment-free variant by 7.6 points and LaMP by 3.0 points. It obtains 80.44% and 81.48% on the clean and randomized RoboTwin 2.0 splits, and 67.5% average success across four physical bimanual tasks, 25.0 points above the alignment-free variant. The gains across simulation and physical tasks support action-aligned 3D tracker features as privileged supervision for tracker-free VLA deployment. Our project page is available at https://wing0night.github.io/track4action-project-page.
This work introduces a history pathway that enables a vanilla VLA model to summarize observation history into temporally aware latent representations, which captures the evolving 3D world through temporally consistent geometric representations, enabling a deeper understanding of dynamic environments.
Xing-Yu Ding, Yu-Zhong Zhao, Chun-Ming Zhao et al.· 1 citation
Active vision manipulation requires a policy to control both its camera and its end-effectors, yet camera motion determines which evidence remains visible within finite observation windows. Acquiring a new view can displace task-critical cues, while retaining a view forgoes potentially useful observations. We formulate...
We introduce BIND, a new action representation for visuomotor robot policies that binds 3D robot actions to their corresponding 2D image features, yielding strong data efficiency gains and robustness to out-of-distribution object positions and camera viewpoints. The action heads of current robot policies are typically...
C. Smith, Arsh Tangri, V. Guizilini et al.· 0 citations
GaussianDream demonstrates that training-time current Gaussian reconstruction and future Gaussian prediction provide effective 3D supervision, but its dense VGGT/TGE-based prefix jointly carries state, dynamics, and action-conditioning information.
Yu-Qing Jiang, Zi-Jian Zhang, Wei-Tao Zhou et al.· 1 citation
Comparing current and past observations helps robots understand scene changes and select subsequent actions during manipulation. However, comparing visual features at the same image location can mix different scene content when objects or the camera move. We introduce CoRe-WAM, a world-action model that incorporates co...
Bing-Heng Zhou, Jia-Long Liu, Jia-Nan Wang et al.· 0 citations
Geometry-Change VLA (GC-VLA), which learns to predict multiview future-current geometry-change tokens from current observations and applies Geometry-Conditioned Residual Flow (GCRF), using a binary intervention router and a single bounded residual velocity policy learned from closed-loop feedback.
Jinu Pahk, Jesoon Kang, T. Park et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.