Skip to content
Review Open access

An Investigation on Reinforcement Learning Approaches to Maze Solving

Jul 2026 · Theoretical and Natural Science · Vol 175, pp. 58-65 · 0 citations

TL;DR

This paper summarizes the maze solving methods based on RL and mainly includes seven categories: Deep Q-Networks, Quantum Reinforcement Learning(QRL), Hierarchical RL, Curriculum Learning, Reward Shaping, Transfer Learning, and Multi-Agent RL.

Abstract

The problem of moving from a starting point to a destination through a maze of walls and passages, known as maze solving, has been an active field of research in mathematics and computer science for decades with applications to robotics, logistics, network routing and game AI. Classical search algorithms such as Depth First Search (DFS), Breadth First Search (BFS) and A* provide deterministic guarantees but require complete prior knowledge of the environment and fail in dynamic or partially observable settings. Reinforcement learning (RL) provides a completely different paradigm. Agents learn the optimal navigation strategy through trial and error interaction, without relying on predefined maps. This paper summarizes the maze solving methods based on RL. The research methods mainly include seven categories: Deep Q-Networks, Quantum Reinforcement Learning(QRL), Hierarchical RL, Curriculum Learning, Reward Shaping, Transfer Learning, and Multi-Agent RL. Each category has representative works, potential mechanisms and experimental results. Then the sample efficiency, scalability, observability requirements and applicability are compared to determine three urgent challenges: sample efficiency in large-scale maze, partial observability and processing of dynamic environment, and the gap between simulation and reality. The purpose of this survey is to provide researchers with a systematic understanding of the current landscape and determine the direction of future work.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Conference Sep 2026

Online Robust Reinforcement Learning Through Monte-Carlo Planning

A new robust variant of MCTS that mitigates dynamical model ambiguities to bridge the gap between simulation-based planning and real-world deployment and empirical evidence is provided that this method achieves robust performance in planning problems even under significant ambiguity in the underlying reward distributio...

T. Dam, Kishan Panaganti, Brahim Driss et al. · 5 citations · ⚡1
Review Open access Aug 2026

Reinforcement Learning for Multimodal Foundation Models: A Survey

A coherent map of the rapidly expanding landscape of visual RL is provided to provide researchers and practitioners with a coherent map of the rapidly expanding landscape of visual RL and to highlight promising directions for future inquiry.

Weijia Wu, Chen Gao, Joya Chen et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Oct 2026

Bidirectional Voronoi-biased Exploration Curriculum for Reinforcement Learning

Long-horizon tasks with sparse rewards pose an exploration bottleneck for goal-conditioned reinforcement learning: a policy started from the initial state rarely reaches the goal and receives no learning signal. Reference motions, hand-designed curricula, and shaped rewards supply this signal but require demonstrations...

J. Pfammatter, Kai-Xian Qu, Clemens Schwarke et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Direction-Conditioned Policies for Online Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning

Contrastive Reinforcement Learning (CRL) learns representations that estimate goal reachability, yet its policy remains conditioned on raw goals and therefore does not directly exploit the geometry encoded by its critic. We introduce Direction-Conditioned Policies (DCP), a method built around a small modification to CR...

S. Swaminathan, Damiya Gondha, Theyanesh Eswaramoorthy Rajahkrishnan et al. · 0 citations
Conference Aug 2026

Reinforcement Learning: Paradigm, Foundations, and Applications

Reinforcement learning (RL) occupies a distinct position within machine learning, differing fundamentally from both supervised and unsupervised paradigms. Unlike supervised learning, RL agents receive evaluative feedback – judgment on the consequences of actions – rather than explicit correct answers, and they learn co...

Khaja Akram Mohammed · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Shaping Gradient and Exploration-Noise Initialization, Not Reward Polarity, Determine Convergence in Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Quadrotor Navigation and Obstacle Avoidance

It is concluded that a continuous shaping gradient and the exploration-noise initialization, interacting with the curriculum advancement criterion, determine convergence in continuous control deep reinforcement learning, and that reward polarity by itself does not.

A. Alkhodre, Mouhamad Alim Al-Amine, Yazed Alsaawy · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.