Skip to content

SVR: Self-Verifying Refinement via Joint Verdict-Confidence Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive Test-Time Compute

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.28457 · 0 citations · 36 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

Self-Verifying Refinement (SVR), an oracle-free multi-turn reinforcement learning framework that learns to use self-verification as a compute-control policy, is introduced to demonstrate that learned self-verification can serve as an effective internal control signal for answer retention and adaptive test-time compute allocation.

Abstract

Scaling test-time computation can improve language-model reasoning, but uniform budgets waste computation on easy inputs, while verifier-guided refinement relies on external feedback. We introduce Self-Verifying Refinement (SVR), an oracle-free multi-turn reinforcement learning framework that learns to use self-verification as a compute-control policy. At each turn, the model produces a solution together with a discrete correctness verdict and a confidence score; it retains the current answer only when the verdict is Correct and confidence exceeds a threshold, and otherwise continues refinement using its own self-verification. Ground-truth correctness is used only to construct training rewards and is never exposed to the policy through refinement prompts or required at inference. SVR is trained with GRPO on fixed-horizon trajectories using rewards that promote solution correctness, calibration-aware self-verification, and stop-ready correct states; adaptive stopping is activated only at inference. On seven mathematical reasoning benchmarks with Qwen3.5-2B, SVR achieves a macro-average accuracy of 0.563 with only 2.99 inference turns on average. In the evaluated complete-system comparison, it exceeds standard GRPO, strong multi-turn baselines, and a fixed-budget oracle-guided score-feedback reference while requiring substantially fewer turns than fixed ten-turn inference. These results demonstrate that learned self-verification can serve as an effective internal control signal for answer retention and adaptive test-time compute allocation.

View source

Similar papers

#reinforcement learning Preprint Aug 2026

AutoVerifier: Residual-Guided Non-Parametric Optimization for Reference-Based Answer Verification

This work proposes AutoVerifier, a residual-guided non-parametric optimization method that learns biases from recurring verifier errors and promotes them to code modules or prompt guidance only after replay validation detects no direct regressions, keeping accepted updates auditable, editable, and reusable.

Zelong Zhao, Zhihui Shi, Min-Qi Shi · 0 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Sep 2026

CovR: Coverage-Aware Hardware Verification via Reasoning-Guided Reinforcement Learning

CovR is presented, an agentic framework for automated testbench generation that combines self-reflection loops with simulation-based feedback to maximize coverage and a reinforcement learning (RL) framework tailored for coverage-driven testbench generation, leveraging tool-derived rewards from simulation and coverage f...

Manar Abdelatty, Maryam Nouh, Sherief Reda · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Aug 2026

AERA: Adaptive Evidence Residual Allocation for Efficient Test-Time Reasoning

The results suggest that adaptive reasoning should estimate the future value of computation rather than equating present confidence with correctness, and introduce Adaptive Evidence Residual Allocation (AERA), a sequential controller that learns whether additional computation is likely to recover a better answer from c...

Zimin Wang, I. Tsang, Hang-Wei Qian · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Aug 2026

Certified Predictive Value-of-Advice Gating for Cost-Aware Language-Model Guidance in Reinforcement Learning

The demonstrated benefit is robust sparse advice volume on a useful task, not a proven per-state placement advantage, because the response-contingent metareasoning problem is formulated as a response-contingent metareasoning problem.

Ibne Farabi Shihab, Md Najmus Swaqeeb, Abu Sa-Adat Mohamed Moon-Im Al Ahsan · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Certified Safety Curation: Distribution-Free Guarantees for Safe Offline Reinforcement Learning

This workCertified safety curation answers with a filter-then-clone pipeline: a state-only value trained from segment comparisons scores whole trajectories, Learn-then-Test calibration certifies a selection threshold under a distribution-free bound on the unsafe fraction of the selection, and behavior cloning follows.

Adam Haroon, Cody H. Fleming · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.