Jul 2026· Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies· Vol abs/2607.14442, pp. 213-231· 0 citations· 57 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
It is found that misalignment disproportionately affects sensitive categories such as personal information and device identifiers, with sharing disclosures exhibiting lower consistency than collection disclosures.
Abstract
With the rapid growth of mobile applications, user data privacy has become an increasing concern. While privacy policies describe how apps collect and share data, platforms such as Google Play provide Data Safety labels intended to summarize these practices. Because these disclosure channels are declared separately, they may present inconsistent representations of app data practices, creating uncertainty for users and regulators. In this work, we conducted a large-scale empirical study of disclosure consistency across 6,051 Android apps. Using an LLM-based extraction framework and a unified schema over 14 Google Play data categories and two operations (collection and sharing), we measure per-app and per-category consistency and introduce a sensitivity-weighted risk score that emphasizes high-risk data types. We find that misalignment disproportionately affects sensitive categories such as personal information and device identifiers, with sharing disclosures exhibiting lower consistency than collection disclosures. Elevated privacy risk is concentrated in app categories associated with persistent monitoring and communication. Overall, our findings highlight structural gaps in current disclosure mechanisms and underscore the need for stronger verification and greater transparency in platform-level privacy reporting.
PrivAudit is presented, an automated auditing framework that adopts a dual-lens approach to capture privacy disclosures through large language model-based analysis of privacy policies grounded in CCPA provisions, and user-observable data collection behavior through automated browser measurements of cookie writes under...
Mohamed Moustafa Dawoud, Riya Aggarwal, Likith Rahul Krishnamurthy et al.· 0 citations
Analysis of the mechanisms designed to regulate and disclose data collection and sharing practices in the macOS ecosystem reveals how the macOS app ecosystem is comprised of disjoint mechanisms with divergent data abstractions, thus increasing complexity for developers while also facilitating undisclosed privacy-invasi...
Jyotirmay Chauhan, Kostas Solomos, Mir Masood Ali et al.· 0 citations
It is argued for treating privacy as an explicit, evidence-based scientific claim and recommend that ML venues adopt norms requiring privacy-relevant assertions to be clearly scoped, testable, and contestable.
The contrasts suggest that QA-structured privacy policies still do not fully meet consumers' needs, although the structure clarifies what specific topics of user interest are missing.
Tian-Yang Zhao, Younes Karimi, Thomas B. Norton et al.· Proceedings of the 2026 ACM...· 0 citations
This work investigates a probabilistic variant of PCD, where an LLM-driven probabilistic estimation of k-anonymity is augmented with an LLM-driven probabilistic estimation of k-anonymity, and proposes k-anonymity as a useful auxiliary metric for tackling PCD.
Initial evaluations using various machine-learning algorithms on pre-and post-generalized datasets demonstrate the privacy framework’s effectiveness in mitigating privacy risks while preserving data usability.
Ze-Yang Zhu, Matthias N. Louws, Roland V. Bumbuc et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.