Pitch‐angle‐resolved electron flux data are crucial for investigating variations in electron flux within the magnetosphere and the underlying mechanisms, such as radial diffusion and wave‐particle interactions. The Medium‐Energy Electron Detector (MEED) onboard the Fengyun‐3E (FY‐3E) satellite in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) provides 18‐directional local pitch angle observations, enabling studies of medium‐energy electrons in LEO. However, the MEED cannot cover the full local pitch angle range continuously from 0° to 180° due to limitations of the satellite's three‐axis stabilized attitude control system. At mid‐latitudes, its pitch angle coverage spans approximately 100° (40°–140°), with improved coverage at low and high latitudes. To extend MEED's coverage toward full global pitch angle observations, we propose a data imputation method using the MEED data and machine learning technology. We have trained eight imputation models based on Multi‐Layer Perceptron (MLP) using electron flux data near 90° local pitch angle and satellite orbital data to generate missing data near 0° and 180° with 280–600 keV energies. For unseen data in test sets, the correlation coefficient
r
between the models' reconstructions and observations is at least 0.915, with a maximum Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 0.110 on the logarithmic scale, which indicates that the models can provide reasonably reliable estimates for missing values. Besides, these imputation models may support future near‐real‐time electron flux imputation when operational data streams become available. This work helps expand the mid‐latitude pitch angle coverage of the FY‐3E MEED, improving data usability, and aiding the development of electron flux prediction models in LEO.
Magnetic reconnection at the dayside magnetopause is the primary pathway for transferring mass, momentum, and energy from the solar wind into the terrestrial magnetosphere. Previous studies have shown that the spatiotemporal dynamics of dayside magnetic reconnection can be inferred remotely from properties of Earth's...
G. Cucho-Padin, D. Sibeck, Xue-Yi Wang et al.· Journal of Geophysical Resea...· 0 citations
The high‐latitude ionosphere exhibits rapid spatial and temporal variability during geomagnetically active periods, creating persistent challenges for accurate nowcasts. The High‐latitude Workbox for the Ionosphere (HAWK‐I) is a real‐time ionosphere nowcast and specification system designed for operational deployment t...
P. Dandenault, C. Cantrall, R. Schaefer et al.· Space Weather· 0 citations
Traditional deep learning models for the ionosphere often rely on space weather indices as inputs, offering predictive capability but limited physical interpretability. We present SRON2NN, a physics‐motivated artificial neural network (ANN) that incorporates two geophysically motivated features: effective solar rad...
Hong-Wei Gong, H. Fang, Die Duan et al.· Journal of Geophysical Resea...· 0 citations
Ultra‐low frequency (ULF) waves are crucial drivers of energetic electron radial diffusion in Earth's radiation belts. However, present radial diffusion coefficients are predominantly derived for equatorially mirroring electrons, relying on ULF wave power models from near‐equatorial spacecraft. Here, we present a com...
G. Riggs, W. Tu, T. Sarris· Journal of Geophysical Resea...· 0 citations
The Earth's ionosphere is sensitive to variations in solar irradiance associated with the 11‐year and the 27‐day solar cycles (SCs). Previous studies have suggested that the peak altitude of the 27‐day SC response in ionospheric electron density is significantly higher than that of the 11‐year SC response, but the un...
Shu-Hui Wang, King-Fai Li, M. Liang et al.· Journal of Geophysical Resea...· 0 citations
Relativistic electron precipitation from the radiation belts is one of the most important channels of radiation belt loss and an essential element of magnetosphere‐ionosphere coupling. While precipitation patterns associated with different mechanisms can be identified using pitch‐angle‐resolved measurements at low‐Ea...
Y. Mei, Xiao-Jia Zhang, A. Artemyev et al.· Journal of Geophysical Resea...· 0 citations