Skip to content

Differentiable Interval Bottlenecks for Interpretable Anomaly Detection in Numerical Data

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 39 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

DIFFINT is proposed, an autoencoder whose latent bottleneck is structured as a set of soft, axis-aligned interval memberships learned end-to-end directly from raw numerical data, without any discretization or binarization.

Abstract

Reconstruction-based anomaly detectors are accurate but opaque: a deep autoencoder flags a sample without telling a practitioner which feature ranges made it anomalous. We propose DIFFINT, an autoencoder whose latent bottleneck is structured as a set of soft, axis-aligned interval memberships learned end-to-end directly from raw numerical data, without any discretization or binarization. Each latent unit corresponds to a human-readable hyper-rectangle in feature space; an instance is encoded by how strongly it falls inside each interval relative to the other units, and its reconstruction error is the anomaly score. This keeps the power of differentiable representation learning while exposing an inspectable internal structure. We make the inductive bias precise: a certified reconstruction-error lower bound for points that fall outside every active coordinate of the learned support (with a Lipschitz-enforced decoder), and a graded, empirically verified suppression mechanism for the usual case in which only a few features are abnormal; and we provide a closed-form, label-free importance that ranks each (unit, feature) pair from quantities the model already maintains, turning trained intervals into auditable candidate constraints without ever seeing an anomaly label. On 48 ADBench benchmarks against 22 baselines under a common [-1, 1]-normalized protocol, DIFFINT attains the best mean rank overall on both metrics (4.10 on ROC-AUC, 4.16 on AUPR); among inlier-only detectors it leads its regime clearly, and it is competitive with the strongest contaminated-data detectors (see the stratified and complete-case analyses). It is the only interpretable detector in the statistically-tied leading cluster of seven methods.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Preprint Oct 2026

Adapting prior-data fitted networks for tabular anomaly detection

While deep features have transformed anomaly detection in images and video, their impact on tabular data has been less substantial, partly due to the limited availability of strong deep representations. Recently, prior-data fitted networks (PFNs) have emerged as a promising source of such representations for tabular da...

Maximilian Bershtman, Niv Cohen · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Have an LLM Write Your Anomaly Detector: Autonomous Discovery of Compact, Interpretable Detectors for Time Series

Time-series anomaly detection trades off predictive accuracy, computational efficiency, and interpretability. We use a large language model not as the detector but as the author of one: an autonomous research loop in which the model repeatedly edits a single short NumPy program under a leakage-free objective, keeping t...

D. Berghaus · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Augmenting Visual Anomaly Detection with Automated Interpretability

Visual anomaly detectors identify deviations from known-normal data, but their anomaly signals may mix evidence of actual anomalies with benign visual variation. We investigate whether automated interpretability can augment visual anomaly detectors by identifying and intervening on different components of this signal....

Antonio De Santis, Arsenio Leo, Marco Brambilla · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

LLM as Detector: An In-context Learning Approach for Tabular Anomaly Detection

LLM-Detector is proposed, a framework that utilizes the in-context learning capacity of LLMs for structured, prompt-conditioned scoring synthesis, enabling LLMs to derive anomaly detection logic from structured normal-state knowledge.

Tu Nguyen, Dang Nguyen, T. D. Le et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Oct 2026

Representation--Behavior Alignment for Explainable Weakly-Supervised Video Anomaly Detection

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) provide a natural way to make video anomaly detection more explainable. However, their final decisions do not always fully use the discriminative information contained in their hidden states, an issue we refer to as representation--behavior misalignment. We decompose this gap in...

Chao Huang, Peng-Fei Wei, Kai-Ge Li et al. · 0 citations
Conference Aug 2026

Unsupervised anomaly detection method based on discrete feature rectification

The proposed RD framework strengthens anomaly detection capability through a Discrete Feature Rectification (DFR) strategy and a Multi-Scale Feature Fusion (MFF) module, which effectively integrates rectified multi-level features for high-quality reconstruction.

Xinyue Liu, Xue Chang, Jia-Jie Chai et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 29, 2026

Who we become when we talk to machines

Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.