This study incorporates text mining into critical discourse analysis to examine how government science agencies in China and the United States position themselves in space science communication on social media. Two specialized corpora have been built by collecting posts from government science agencies on Weibo from China and X (formerly Twitter) from the U.S. With the help of the text mining tool KH Coder, this study gives a corpus-assisted discourse analysis of the particular ways of positioning at different levels of discourse: (1) topics/themes, (2) addressing terms, and (3) those words that co-occur with self-addressing terms in a sentence. The findings reveal significant differences in their preferential ways of positioning. Chinese government science agencies present themselves as state-affiliated yet approachable institutions, blending achievements and operational efficiency with patriotism and collective pride. Their use of diverse addressing terms and co-occurrence patterns portrays them as experienced, supportive guides, balancing national identity with interpersonal closeness. In contrast, U.S. government science agencies emphasize professionalism, focusing on research, space exploration, mission execution, and audience engagement, with minimal reference to state affiliation. Their addressing terms are formal and standardized, with pride centred on mission success and discovery, highlighting expertise and scientific leadership. Their preferential ways of positioning are further explained in their respective contexts in order to present a proper understanding of these differences.
Drawing upon Fairclough’s three-dimensional model of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) and integrating corpus-based approaches, this study constructs a corpus consisting of English diplomatic speeches delivered by representatives of China to the United Nations between 2012 and 2025. Through frequency analysis, keyword...
Ming-He Zhang, Chun-Yan He, Rui-Rui Yang et al.· English Language Teaching· 0 citations
This study examines how
Interpret: China
, a translation archive project hosted by the US-based
Center for Strategic and International Studies, shapes what counts as China for policy-facing publics while presenting its work as
enabling “objective understanding.” Drawing on 335 parallel Chinese source texts and...
Public discussion of scholarship policy involves different communicative activities, including seeking information, sharing experience, and questioning institutional accountability. Understanding how these activities connect requires attention to both network structure and the roles of technologically mediated accounts...
Fathiyyah Azizah, Nadya Tristina, Elisabeth Satya Wacana Patricia S et al.· Language, Technology, and So...· 0 citations
The article examines the formation of perceptions of a neighboring country in the digital discourse of the Russian–Chinese borderland after February 2022. Drawing on public discussions on VKontakte, it analyzes how China’s proximity coexists with the maintenance of a symbolic boundary between local residents and Chines...
Purpose: This study examines the “New Lee Jae-myung” discourse, focusing on the forum titled “Discussing New Lee Jae-myung” held at the National Assembly Members’ Office Building on March 15, 2026, through the lens of Axel Honneth’s theory of recognition. It aims to explore how legitimacy is constructed within discours...
The rapid expansion of social media has transformed public discourse, positioning digital platforms as important spaces for civic engagement and the expression of social values. In Malaysia, Facebook is widely used by government agencies, non-governmental organisations (NGOs), public figures and news organisations to c...
Z. Abdullah, Rosfazila Abd Rahman, Rohaini Amin et al.· International journal of res...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.