The results show that, under a highly polygenic architecture with livestock-like LD, GWAS tool choice has major consequences for biological interpretation, and methods that control long-range LD spillover should be prioritized.
Abstract
In livestock populations, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) can produce strong, apparently localized associations even when no truly discrete nearby causal effect exists. This occurs because small effective population sizes, strong family structure, long-range linkage disequilibrium (LD), and diffuse polygenic architecture can cause the effects of many variants to accumulate and be captured jointly across broad genomic intervals, making variant-level associations difficult to interpret biologically. Using real pig genotypes, we constructed a benchmark in which phenotypes were simulated under diffuse polygenic architecture across a genome partitioned into alternating effect and null windows, with central-null regions (at least 1 Mb away from effect-containing regions) positioned to detect long-range LD-driven signal propagation. We evaluated nine configurations of six GWAS methods (BOLT-LMM, REGENIE, fastGWA, FarmCPU, BLINK, and SLEMM) under this architecture. The central finding is that strong associations, of the kind normally read as evidence of nearby moderate- or large-effect variants, are produced by many of these methods even though the simulated signal is distributed across many tiny effects and cannot be localized to any single variant. The methods differed sharply in the extent of locus-level spillover: several produced large numbers of genome-wide significant loci within central-null regions, whereas the full-GRM mixed-model benchmark (SLEMM) produced no genome-wide significant loci in central-null regions. These results show that, under a highly polygenic architecture with livestock-like LD, GWAS tool choice has major consequences for biological interpretation. When the goal is to localize biologically meaningful signals rather than to flag association peaks that may merely reflect tiny effects accumulated through LD across a broad block, methods that control long-range LD spillover should be prioritized.
This tutorial reviews several widely used methods for pleiotropy detection from GWAS summary statistics, including ASSET, PLACO, GPA, CPBayes, and GCPBayes, and demonstrates their application using breast and thyroid cancer datasets.
Christina Y. Feng, P. Sugier, Nan Zou et al.· Statistics in Medicine· 0 citations
Genome‐wide association studies (GWASs) have been extensively adopted to depict the underlying genetic architecture of complex traits. Recent studies show that knockoff‐based methods can identify variants with unique, potentially causal effects on phenotypes. However, their statistical validity and effectiveness in stu...
Xinran Qi, M. Belloy, Jiaqi Gu et al.· Genetic Epidemiology· 0 citations
Causal disease effect sizes of proximal single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are widely assumed to be independent but could be correlated. Here we introduce a new method, linkage disequilibrium SNP-pair effect correlation regression (LDSPEC), to estimate the correlation of causal disease effect sizes of derived allel...
M. Zhang, Arun Durvasula, C. Chiang et al.· Nature Genetics· 0 citations
This work performs a large-scale, multi-ancestry admixture mapping study across 415,792 unrelated individuals in the UK Biobank, examining associations between local haplotype ancestry and 108 phenotypes, demonstrating striking genetic heterogeneity.
R. Smeriglio, S. Moreno-Grau, D. Mas Montserrat et al.· medRxiv· 0 citations
Complex traits emerge from reciprocal interactions among genotype, environment, and developmental processes. Yet, standard genetic models assume purely additive effects, potentially obscuring non-additive effects. Here, we introduce a longitudinal log-linear variance and genotype-by-time model to detect associations fr...
Ralph Porneso, A. Havdahl, E. Eilertsen et al.· Cell Reports· 0 citations
Additive genetic models are the default for genome-wide association studies, but deviations from additivity are crucial for understanding disease mechanisms and therapeutic responses. Yet existing methods for testing nonadditivity are computationally infeasible for large-scale analysis or rely on Hardy-Weinberg assumpt...
Frederik H. Lassen, S. S. Venkatesh, N. Baya et al.· Nature Communications· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.