Jul 2026· Catholic Institute of Bioethics· Vol 16, pp. 25-60· 0 citations
TL;DR
The paper concludes that the human being is not a sum of functions but a person called toward God, and that making this truth manifest is a distinctive task of theological anthropology in the age of AI.
Abstract
This paper examines the uniqueness of human intellect in the age of AI from the perspective of personalist anthropology. Large language models (LLMs) and other AI systems now imitate with increasing sophistication the external performances of human intellectual activity, such as language production, reasoning, and the synthesis of materials. For this reason, the uniqueness of human intellect cannot be adequately located in a residual set of functions that AI has not yet performed. Rather, it lies in the openness of human knowing toward the unlimited horizon of truth and goodness, and in the fact that this openness takes concrete form in the personal subject’s self-possession, self-gift, and transcendent orientation toward God.
To clarify this thesis, the paper begins with Thomas Aquinas’s notion of natural desire (desiderium naturale) and follows Bernard Lonergan’s analysis of cognitional activity in order to disclose the cognitional structure in which the unlimited orientation of human knowing is rooted. It argues that this unlimited orientation is not something established by external observation or reproduced by the sophisticated execution of external procedures, but rather a reality discovered when the cognitional subject is reflectively present to its own activity. The paper then turns to Karol Wojtyła’s analyses of self-possession, self-gift, and vertical transcendence in order to show how the unlimited orientation of human intellect is realized within the movement of the whole person. It concludes that the human being is not a sum of functions but a person called toward God, and that making this truth manifest is a distinctive task of theological anthropology in the age of AI.
Is it still reasonable to believe in human uniqueness in the age of human-like AI and robots?This book provides an affirmative answer by defending our human uniqueness through inclusive human relationality, with a reference to theimago Dei.
As relational creatures, we may feel deeply related to and connected with arti...
Gerard Johnstone’s M3GAN (2022) presents artificial intelligence not merely as a technological threat but as a challenge to the conceptual boundaries through which humanity defines itself. The film centres on M3GAN, an artificially intelligent humanoid doll created to become a child’s companion and protector, but her i...
Dhanya Ravindran R.K· International Journal of Eng...· 0 citations
ABSTRACT: The aim of this article is to analyze the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in human formation, considering the intellectual condition of the human person. To this end, four aspects of the issue are examined. First, it discusses how Thomas Aquinas understands that the human being can only be regarded as tru...
Terezinha Oliveira, S. Yaegashi, Juliana Calabresi Voss Duarte· Educação em revista· 0 citations
The increasing integration of artificial intelligence into everyday life has created relationships that are not adequately described as merely functional interactions between users and tools. Conversational systems, social robots and autonomous agents can be trusted, loved, relied upon and even moralized. Questions ari...
Aditi Mishra, Vibha Goyal, Ankush Gautam· International Journal of Cre...· 0 citations
This article develops a multidimensional account of the worth of human life and explores its implications for the philosophical foundations of human rights. It argues that traditional monistic accounts, whether theological, rationalist, autonomy-based, sentientist, or capability-oriented, capture important aspects of...
The paper explores whether epistemic concepts – such as belief, knowledge, justification, possession of concepts, and doubt – can be justifiably ascribed to AI models. Various positions on this issue are considered, ranging from skepticism to radical optimism. The position defended in this paper, however, leans more to...
K. G. Frolov· Epistemology & Philosoph...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.