A structured narrative review using predefined searches of Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus to synthesize empirical XAI applications across six water-research domains, with emphasis on method selection, model and data compatibility, explanation reliability, and operational implementation.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used in water research. However, many AI models, particularly complex machine learning models, often generate outcomes that are difficult for humans to interpret. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) has been developed to address these challenges by providing transparent and human-interpretable explanations of model behavior and predictions. We conducted a structured narrative review using predefined searches of Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus to synthesize empirical XAI applications across six water-research domains: hydrological processes, water quality and pollution, groundwater systems, urban water systems, climate–water interactions, and water and wastewater treatment. The review covers feature-importance methods, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME), partial dependence plots (PDPs), individual conditional expectation (ICE) plots, accumulated local effects (ALE) plots, counterfactual explanations, and deep-learning attribution methods. Building on previous reviews and perspectives focused on particular water domains or methodological priorities, we provide a cross-domain synthesis of XAI spanning natural and engineered water systems, with emphasis on method selection, model and data compatibility, explanation reliability, and operational implementation. These capabilities, however, must be interpreted with appropriate caution because XAI explanations remain conditional on the data, fitted model, and explanation method, and therefore should not be treated as evidence of causal mechanisms or environmental controls. Recognizing these limitations, we provide practical guidance for selecting and evaluating XAI methods and outline priorities for developing reliable, scalable, and operationally useful AI systems for water research and management.
It is concluded that explainability is a necessary, though not sufficient, condition for trustworthy Al, and concrete directions for future research are outlined, including standardised benchmarks, human-centred evaluation, and explainability for large generative models.
Afna Ashraff M, Archana K, Buthaina Buthaina et al.· International Journal of Tec...· 0 citations
Artificial intelligence (AI), explainable AI (XAI), digital twins, and intelligent decision-support systems are increasingly proposed for water management, yet existing reviews usually emphasize algorithms or architectures rather than the evidence chain from prediction to governed decisions and measured outcomes. This...
This work investigates LLM-based forecasting agents, meaning systems in which a language model contributes to a scored prediction about a future or currently unobserved target, and organizes architectures into three groups.
Xiao-Gang Xu, Jiaqi Tang, Jianmin Chen et al.· 0 citations
This study critically investigates the evolving role of artificial intelligence (AI) in financial forecasting through a systematic literature review conducted across multiple reputable academic databases, and identifies persistent limitations, including model opacity, data quality concerns, and compliance challenges.
Wasiu Eyinade· World Journal of Finance and...· 0 citations
Understanding the main drivers of water demand predictive models is important for model applications and usability. The ever-increasing computational capacity has enabled multiple complex models to excel at predicting demand values. However, the understanding of how the model works and what predictors are responsible...
Angela Maldonado Alfaro, Carly Boyer, Jorge E. Pesantez· Journal of water resources p...· 0 citations
Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming computational biology. However, closer scrutiny reveals that many reported results do not hold under rigorous evaluation. This paper identifies prevalent, recurring issues in the field, including narrow datasets, hidden confounders that make supposedly indep...
T. Khang, Joshua W. K. Ho, Lin Hou et al.· Quantitative Biology· 0 citations
AI is moving beyond impressive demos. After World Summit AI 2026 in Amsterdam, GPT-Lab's Muhammad Waseem reflects on what organizations need to make AI agents reliable, responsible and genuinely useful in everyday work. The post Building trustworthy AI: The role of AI harnesses, intent contracts and evals appeared first on GPT-Lab.
Learn how Google DeepMind and GovTech Singapore uses lightweight on-device Gemma models to intercept conversational scams in private chats with zero cloud data egress.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 13, 2026