Skip to content

CausalProfiler: Generating Synthetic Benchmarks for Rigorous and Transparent Evaluation of Causal Machine Learning

Nov 2025 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2511.22842 · 0 citations
Computer Science

TL;DR

This work offers the first random generator of synthetic causal benchmarks with coverage guarantees and transparent assumptions operating on the three levels of causal reasoning: observation, intervention, and counterfactual, and demonstrates its utility by evaluating several state-of-the-art methods under diverse conditions and assumptions.

Abstract

Causal machine learning (Causal ML) aims to answer"what if"questions using machine learning algorithms, making it a promising tool for high-stakes decision-making. Yet, empirical evaluation practices in Causal ML remain limited. Existing benchmarks often rely on a handful of hand-crafted or semi-synthetic datasets, leading to brittle, non-generalizable conclusions. To bridge this gap, we introduce CausalProfiler, a synthetic benchmark generator for Causal ML methods. Based on a set of explicit design choices about the class of causal models, queries, and data considered, the CausalProfiler randomly samples causal models, data, queries, and ground truths constituting the synthetic causal benchmarks. In this way, Causal ML methods can be rigorously and transparently evaluated under a variety of conditions. This work offers the first random generator of synthetic causal benchmarks with coverage guarantees and transparent assumptions operating on the three levels of causal reasoning: observation, intervention, and counterfactual. We demonstrate its utility by evaluating several state-of-the-art methods under diverse conditions and assumptions, both in and out of the identification regime, illustrating the types of analyses and insights the CausalProfiler enables.

View source

Similar papers

Review Open access Jul 2026

Causal Inference and Machine Learning for Reliable Decision-Making

The methodological bridge connecting causal reasoning with modern supervised learning is reviewed and why correlation-driven models give biased answers to questions about actions is explained.

R. M. · 0 citations
#machine learning Review Jul 2026

CausalSmith: A Formally Grounded, Self-Improving Agentic Framework for Automated Research in Causal Inference

A framework for automated theoretical research in causal inference built on the Lean proof assistant, where a proof is checked by a program rather than read by a referee is presented, where a proof is checked by a program rather than read by a referee.

Jiyuan Tan, Vasilis Syrgkanis · 0 citations
Case report 2026

Causal AI for Real-World Data

Participants will learn to apply the Causal Roadmap and implement state-of-the-art tools in R and Python and leave with reproducible artifacts to support transparent, peer‑reviewable causal claims.

M. Gregg, Andy Wilson · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 29, 2026

Who we become when we talk to machines

Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.