Skip to content
#small language model Book Open access

AI for Recruitment Administration

Sep 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Abstract

Measuring the waits a hiring process creates, and keeping the record it owes Four working days of internal approval are three weeks of silence on the other side, and almost every complaint about hiring is a complaint about that gap rather than about the decision at the end of it. Recruitment administration is a queue with people in it, and the work divides into the part that shortens a wait and the part that shortens the record. Only the first is worth doing. Every process failure a small employer actually suffers, the candidate who was never told, the shortlist nobody can reconstruct, the panel slot that took eleven days to find, is located at a nameable waiting point and can be measured in days by whoever owns it. A chat model helps with the language sitting around those points: an advertisement drafted from a requisition, four hundred applications turned into a scheduling problem, the reply that was never sent. It must be kept away from the judgement at the centre, because a ranking that looks reasonable is the most expensive artefact in this subject and the hardest to argue with six months later. Audiences: The person who owes four hundred replies — Posted one role, received four hundred applications, shortlisted six, and told none of the other three hundred and ninety-four anything. Knows it is wrong, has no hour in the week where writing that correspondence fits, and will do the same thing on the next requisition. The person waiting on a panel — Has a shortlist and cannot convene three people in one room inside a fortnight. Every day of that fortnight is a day a preferred candidate spends accepting somebody else's offer, and the delay is invisible internally because everyone involved is busy and nobody is idle. The person asked why, six months later — Is asked to explain a hiring decision made half a year ago and finds a requisition, an offer, and nothing in between: no screening notes, no dated shortlist, no record of what the panel was asked to weigh. The process was followed and none of it was written down. Note: written from Indonesian operator context. Frameworks apply broadly to other emerging-market and SME settings.

View source

Similar papers

#small language model Dataset Open access Oct 2026

Socratic guiding questions in synthetic arithmetic data: matched LoRA runs (revision v2)

Supporting data, adapters, predictions and code for the article *Low-Cost LoRA Fine-Tuning of Small Language Models for Multi-Step Arithmetic Reasoning* by Jake O'Grady, Asena Isik Gürhan, Chee Fong Ting and Effirul Ramlan (University of Galway). We generated 20,000 GSM8K-derived arithmetic problems with step-by-step s...

O'Grady, Jake, Gürhan, Asena Isik, Chee, Fong Ting et al. · 465 citations
#computer vision Open access Jun 2016

Software Development in Startup Companies: The Greenfield Startup Model

The results are packaged in the Greenfield Startup Model (GSM), which explains the priority of startups to release the product as quickly as possible, and the need to shorten time-to-market, by speeding up the development through low-precision engineering activities.

Carmine Giardino, Nicolò Paternoster, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 178 citations · ⚡14
#computer vision Open access Oct 2016

Software Startups - A Research Agenda

Software startup companies develop innovative, software-intensive products within limited timeframes and with few resources, searching for sustainable and scalable business models.

M. Unterkalmsteiner, P. Abrahamsson, Xiaofeng Wang et al. · 157 citations · ⚡17
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#computer vision Review Open access May 2015

A survey study on major technical barriers affecting the decision to adopt cloud services

The comparison of adopter and non-adopter sample reveals three potential adoption inhibitor, security, data privacy, and portability, which underlines the importance of the technical and security perspectives for research investigating the adoption of technology.

Nattakarn Phaphoom, Xiaofeng Wang, S. Samuel et al. · 111 citations · ⚡8
#large language models Review Open access Nov 2020

Status of the WHO recommended timing and frequency of antenatal care visits in Northern Bangladesh

Objective There is dearth of information on the timeliness of antenatal care (ANC) uptake. This study aimed to determine the timely ANC uptake by a medically trained provider (MTP) as per the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations and the country guideline. Methods Cross-sectional survey was done with 2,731 wo...

B. Sarker, Musfikur Rahman, T. Rahman et al. · 89 citations · ⚡7

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.