Jul 2026· Machine Learning: Science and Technology· Vol 7, pp. 045042· 0 citations· 32 references
Physics
TL;DR
This work presents a framework that integrates the parametrized-background data-weak formulation with attention-based parameter identification networks, and projects model error onto a dictionary of physically motivated spatial templates rather than learning arbitrary corrections.
Abstract
Parameter identification in nonlinear dynamical systems is complicated by model-form uncertainty arising from systematic biases that violate the zero-mean error assumption of standard data assimilation methods. Recent neural-network-based approaches learn arbitrary bias corrections online. However, they require careful regularization to ensure unique solutions and carry computational overhead from ensemble propagation and in-situ training. We present a framework that integrates the parametrized-background data-weak formulation with attention-based parameter identification networks. It projects model error onto a dictionary of physically motivated spatial templates rather than learning arbitrary corrections. This provides uniqueness through hard subspace constraints rather than soft regularization penalties, albeit at the cost of restricting the representable bias space to patterns anticipated from domain knowledge. The framework is demonstrated on parameter estimation in the Rijke tube model, achieving robust generalization to out-of-distribution (OOD) bias patterns not seen during training. Ablation studies confirm the importance of state supervision for amplitude-sensitive parameters and temporal bias modeling for phase-sensitive parameters. Performance degrades gradually when bias patterns lie outside the template span. This indicates that the attention encoder extracts parameter information from bias-invariant features rather than relying critically on template-based bias capture. The physics-constrained and universal approximator approaches represent complementary points on the flexibility–efficiency tradeoff, suited to different operational contexts.
The Fokker-Planck partial differential equation (FP-PDE) governs uncertainty evolution in stochastic dynamical systems. In orbital dynamics, solving the FP-PDE is challenging because of nonlinear motion, high-dimensional states, and large space-time domains. We develop a physics-informed neural network (PINN) approach...
Chun-Wei Kong, Morteza Lahijanian, Jay W. McMahon· 0 citations
The core innovation lies in using the physics-informed neural networks mechanism to estimate the nonparametric uncertainty by embedding the system dynamics as a constraint in the loss function, ensuring physically consistent and highly generalizable uncertainty estimation even with sparse data.
Na Sun, Xin Dong, Kun Liang et al.· Transactions of the Institut...· 0 citations
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) can attain small residuals for partial differential equations while drifting from global invariants. We separate residual-based training from invariant enforcement: a standard PINN is trained first, and its output is then projected onto a selected invariant manifold at inference...
A robust framework for jointly modeling constrained multi-field data based on a linearly-constrained multi-output GP approach based on a specific kernel parametrization which is trained on the latent space of row-wise PCA.
Mahamat Hamdan Nassouradine, C. Gauchy, Pierre-Emmanuel Angeli et al.· 0 citations
Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) typically exhibit spectral bias, where some frequencies of the target function converge more slowly than others. In this work, we analyze the training dynamics of Fourier Feature PINNs in the Neural Tangent Kernel regime to address this limitation. We derive an explicit evolutio...
Juan Molina, P. Perdikaris, Mircea Petrache et al.· 0 citations
This work proposes a Reduced-Order Physics-Informed Neural Network (RO-PINN) framework with adaptive basis refinement for structural identification under known and incomplete physics, and shows parameter identification comparable to or more accurate than Bayesian model updating with lower computational cost.
Rui Zhang, Konstantinos Vlachas, Eleni N. Chatzi· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.