Jul 2026· 2026 IEEE International Conference on Innovation, Ethics & Emerging Tech in Engineering and Computing Education (IE2C)· pp. 1-6· 0 citations· 32 references
Abstract
Technology Transfer Offices (TTOs) play a critical role in converting university research into commercial impact, yet many face severe operational strain from manual workflows and limited staffing. This paper presents an Ethical AI-Enabled University Technology Transfer architecture, developed as a Design Science Research (DSR) case study based on the ICCubeX framework at Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM). Positioned at the operational micro-layer to complement macro enterprise frameworks like COBIT, TOGAF, and SAFe, the modular architecture integrates a secure Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) framework via access-controlled REST APIs to safeguard institutional data sovereignty. It employs a deterministic 85% mathematical confidence threshold to automatically route codified inquiries while directing complex, cross-disciplinary cases to an asynchronous Human-in-the-Loop governance layer to preserve officer validation and override authority. To ensure empirically testable outcomes, the framework establishes a Transformation Success Matrix targeting quantifiable benchmarks across inquiry turnaround agility, triage automation rates, and legacy database interoperability. The study contributes a theoretically grounded, governance-aware digital transformation blueprint for scalable and secure university technology transfer ecosystems.
AI-native IT architecture is fundamentally reshaping the modern enterprise and accelerating the shift toward decentralized autonomous networks. While this transition unlocks unprecedented capabilities, it also introduces a wave of complex security vulnerabilities. Today, enterprises face a tripartite challenge which ar...
U. Shumugam, Nurshahida Binti Muhamad Razali, Syed Mohsen Bin Syed Abu Bakar Alkaff et al.· International journal of res...· 0 citations
The case indicates that university digital transformation is strengthened when technological implementation is integrated with formal governance, systematic assessment, evidence-based planning, and institutional accountability.
Jennifer Célleri-Pacheco, Fernanda Tusa Jumbo, Oswaldo Chuquirima Camacho et al.· Future Internet· 0 citations
The article proposes the Digital Infrastructure Governance and Selection (DIGS) framework, which combines seven decision domains with six stage gates spanning problem definition, mandatory assurance, comparative assessment, controlled piloting, contracting and implementation, and lifecycle review and is a transparent d...
Fatema Akter· International Journal of Sci...· 0 citations
How do institutional constraints, technological embeddedness, and platform governance co-evolve to reconfigure the public health governance of regulated digital service industries? This article develops a triadic co-evolutionary framework—the ITP model—that integrates institutional theory, technological evolution theor...
Yiding Xiao, Zirui Liao, Hailin Zhang· Frontiers in Public Health· 0 citations
The study conceptualises governance tensions in GenAI adoption as inherent paradoxes arising from the same mechanisms that create value, and proposes the Assure-Account-Align routine as a candidate bridge between contextual conditions (TOE) and dynamic action (DC), offering a sensitising device for future research rath...
Ginevra Degregori, Davide Calandra, P. Biancone· Management Decision· 0 citations
Early end-user participation in architectural decision-making remains limited despite Building Information Modelling (BIM) and Digital Twin practice. This paper presents a human-centred, lifecycle-oriented framework that integrates extended reality (XR), generative artificial intelligence (AI), and metaverse environmen...
Sepehr Abrishami, Irem Uran Tak· Sustainability· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.