Skip to content
Open access

A call for an interdisciplinary ethical foundation for GenAI governance in higher education

Aug 2026 · Discover Artificial Intelligence · Vol 6 · 0 citations · 34 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

The TPPP Nexus demonstrates that ethical GenAI governance should go beyond policy compliance and detection tools to cultivate reflection, intellectual integrity, and ethical resilience among learners and educators.

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) systems are increasingly embedded in higher education, shaping writing, instructional design, and institutional approaches to academic integrity. In response, universities have developed policies, ethical guidelines, and detection tools; however, most approaches frame governance primarily as compliance—focusing on technical reliability, permissible use, and policy enforcement—while neglecting users’ moral agency, cognitive engagement, and responsibility. This perspective article introduces the TPPP Nexus, an interdisciplinary framework integrating Technology, Pedagogy, Philosophy, and Psychology as the normative and cognitive foundation for GenAI governance in higher education. Integrating insights from virtue ethics and moral philosophy, as well as cognitive and motivational psychology, the framework reconceptualizes governance as an emergent, human-centered practice shaped by ethical reasoning and human behavior, rather than by algorithmic sophistication or instructional design alone. Technology enables GenAI use, pedagogy guides everyday academic application, philosophy grounds ethical judgment and responsibility, and psychology illuminates cognition, motivation, and agency in human–GenAI interaction. The TPPP Nexus demonstrates that ethical GenAI governance should go beyond policy compliance and detection tools to cultivate reflection, intellectual integrity, and ethical resilience among learners and educators. By advancing a human-centered, interdisciplinary model, this perspective invites higher education to approach GenAI governance not only as institutional oversight but as a shared moral and educational responsibility that fosters human flourishing in the age of GenAI.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Bridging Ethics and Regulation: A Conceptual Framework for Governing Generative AI in Higher Education

The Ethico-Regulatory Governance (ERG) Framework is proposed, a conceptual model designed to bridge global ethics with local compliance, and offers a scalable, adaptable solution for universities navigating the complexities of GenAI.

Christian Roberto Cabezas Freire, Nayana Desai · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Educational leadership in the age of artificial intelligence: The moral compass in the machine

This conceptual paper argues that traditional technology governance models are insufficient and that leaders must develop an augmented moral compass to navigate algorithmic decision-making, data governance, and equity and proposes an original Moral Compass Model.

Nashwa Ali · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Human-Centred AI in Education and Governance: Ethical Challenges of Digital Transformation

A six-element governance framework is developed comprising legitimate purpose and proportionality; explicit allocation of roles and responsibility; traceable data, evidence, and uncertainty; competent human oversight and calibrated reliance; stakeholder participation, contestability, and redress; and continuous monitor...

M. Nesterova · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Generative AI in education: A Human–AI pedagogical agency framework for learning, cognition, and ethics

This article proposes the Human–AI Pedagogical Agency Framework (HAPAF), composed of five interacting layers: epistemic positioning, learner agency, interaction design, verification, and governance, which reframes effective GenAI integration as an agency-preserving pedagogical design problem rather than a tool-adoption...

A. Haro-Sarango · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Ethical Knowledge and Human-Centered Strategic Management in Education: A Philosophy of Science Perspective

The study entitled “Ethical Knowledge and Human-Centered Strategic Management in Education: A Philosophy of Science Perspective” is motivated by the growing use of data, performance measurement, and artificial intelligence in educational management. It aims to explain how ontology, epistemology, and axiology can shape...

Sri Yusriani, Adi Dasmin, Endi Rekarti et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

English Classroom as a Platform for Ethical Reasoning in Technical Education

In contemporary technical education, the cultivation of ethical reasoning has become as essential as the acquisition of technical knowledge and skills. Engineers are increasingly expected to not only design and innovate but also to make decisions that reflect social responsibility and ethical integrity. This paper expl...

Gnana Latha Dr. R · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.