Skip to content
Review Open access

"We Know What We Don't Know" A Reflexive Synthesis of Research and Lay Knowledge Regarding Group Decision-Making in Mountaineering.

Sep 2026 · Psychology of Sport And Exercise · Vol 88, pp. 103257 · 0 citations · 135 references
Medicine

Abstract

Groups navigating dynamic and hazardous mountain environments must continuously engage in collective decision-making. However, the assumption that groups naturally make better decisions than individuals is misleading. Groupthink, group polarisation, and other social dynamics can impair judgement and lead to sub-optimal or even dangerous outcomes, making group decision-making a critical factor for safety in mountaineering. This scoping review maps the existing research on group decision-making in mountaineering using a systematic literature search complemented by reflexive thematic analysis. From 107 identified articles, we derived 14 themes, subsumed within six layers of influence, including factors benefitting group-decision making, authenticity, social influence, external pressure, expertise and contextual dynamics. Together, these themes underscore the complexity of group decision- making in the high-stakes environment. Our findings highlight its central role in mountaineering and provide useful directions for future research and practice.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

Navigating Challenges in Forming Grassroots Women's Groups: Exploring the Struggles of Building Collective Agency and Capabilities in a Rural Context

Collective action is often treated as a desirable and scalable outcome of participatory initiatives, yet far less attention has been paid to the conditions under which collective agency fails to consolidate. This article examines how collective agency is initiated but ultimately unravels within a grassroots women's i...

Marta Solórzano-García, Nerea Abad-Itoiz · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Determining the facts that matter in complex decision-making: A critical realist framework of identifying valid knowledge in planning

While the role of valid knowledge in planning decision-making is recognised in literature, the determination of validity and its relationship to controversial planning decisions is under theorised. In this paper, critical realism is utilised to explore hegemonic influences on the determination of validity as an explana...

Andrew Ivins · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Overlap and Obstacles in Decision-Making Across Scientific, Indigenous and Local Knowledge Systems

In this exploratory review and conceptual analysis, we examine cases and debates in the theoretical literature that highlight biodiversity and conservation decision-making contexts in which knowledge systems, and their interactions or lack thereof, are central concerns. A review of scientific articles indexed in the We...

J. Persson, Anna Kvist · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Beyond the participation ladder: linking Values–Rules–Knowledge decision contexts to participation quality in China’s territorial spatial planning

Public participation, often theorized within Western democratic planning traditions, is widely viewed as essential for sustainable development. As planning is simultaneously people-centered and technically intensive, participation is crucial for legitimacy; however, higher positions on participation ladders do not auto...

Yi-Long Li, Yu-Ting Tang, Christopher D. Ives · 0 citations
Open access 2026

Community perspectives on the role of power and place-based knowledge at the frontline of gray wolf ( Canis lupus ) return

Conflict and coexistence between large carnivores and human communities can be shaped by tolerance, or people’s willingness to absorb the impacts and benefits of large carnivores within shared landscapes. In the last decade, hazard acceptance models (HAMs) have become one of the most popular psychological models for ch...

Lara Volski, Anne H. Beaudreau, A. McInturff · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Centering equity, diversity and inclusion in environmental evidence synthesis: from awareness to action

Knowledge generated through evidence synthesis is an approach that decision-makers can take to inform policy and management decisions. Evidence syntheses, such as systematic reviews, provide quantitative and qualitative summaries of this evidence, using structured methods that make them comprehensive and repeatable...

M. Harper, Jennifer F. Provencher, Steven M. Alexander et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.