2026· IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking· Vol 12, pp. 11341-11357· 0 citations· 39 references
Abstract
Cloud-edge-end collaborative Artificial Intelligence (AI) computing requires schedulers that allocate heterogeneous resources for Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG)-structured workflows across network tiers. Cross-tier data transfers create ripple effects where a single placement decision propagates delays to downstream tasks, degrading end-to-end completion rates. This paper presents DREAM, a Dynamic Ripple-Effect-Aware Meta-scheduling scheme in which Critical Path Lookahead Scheduling (CPLS) performs bounded-depth trajectory planning with soft reservations for critical tasks, while Opportunity-Cost-Aware Placement (OCAP) evaluates non-critical tasks through a four-component cost covering immediate efficiency, ripple effect, load stability, and opportunity cost. Extensive simulations demonstrate that under the heavy load of 600 tasks, DREAM sustains a task completion rate of ~66%, exceeding classical heuristics by over 10 percentage points. At the extreme load of 1000 tasks, the system utility score improves by 47% over HEFT. Robustness experiments verify competitive performance across multiple DAG topologies and estimation-noise levels.
G-STAR is a general graph-based scheduling framework that formalizes complex MAS pipelines as attributed Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs) and develops an industry-grade orchestration stack with asynchronous execution, resilient serving, and audit-friendly artifacts, offering a practical solution for optimizing web-scale deployments of complex MAS pipelines.
Jiabao Song, Yunsheng Xia, Beibei Kong et al.· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 0 citations
The lack of determinism restricts the integration of safety-critical applications into Edge–Fog–Cloud (EFC) architectures. Existing EFC schedulers are typically designed for dynamic, best-effort operation based on unmanaged resource allocation and elastic virtualization. This paradigm introduces unbounded queueing, resource contention, and timing jitter, making standard schedulers unsuitable for hard-deadline workloads. Moreover, most approaches focus on computational placement, while communication is abstracted or treated as a secondary cost term. As a result, bounded-latency routing and deterministic task execution are rarely co-optimized under a unified timing model. This paper addresses these gaps by utilizing a managed Time-Triggered Edge–Fog–Cloud (TTEFC) architecture that supports safety-critical workloads, orchestrates IEEE Time-Sensitive Networking (TSN) for local intra-domain communication, and uses IETF Deterministic Networking (DetNet) for routed inter-domain paths. On this infrastructure, a hierarchical genetic algorithm (HGA) is proposed to jointly schedule partition-to-execution-location allocation, partition execution order, inter-partition route selection, and negotiated per-partition time budgets that act as temporal boundaries for parallel partition-level optimizers. An adaptive slack reallocation operator redistributes unused temporal slack from over-satisfied partitions to budget-violating partitions, improving feasibility convergence. Experiments on synthetic DAG workloads with 100–500 tasks compare the proposed HGA against HEFT and round-robin baselines. These baselines are included as scoped external references to contextualize the end-to-end scheduling performance of the proposed method. Ablation results show that slack reallocation improves partition-budget feasibility, reaches feasible budget assignments earlier, and produces tighter budget–makespan alignment than feedback-free and static-budget variants. An automotive-characteristic DAG case study further evaluates the method on an application-oriented workload under the same timing and communication assumptions.
Omar Hekal, Josepaul Paulachan, Daniel Onwuchekwa et al.· Future Internet· 0 citations
Stream-processing systems increasingly operate across heterogeneous mobile edge--cloud infrastructures, where workload volatility, resource contention, and stringent quality-of-service (QoS) requirements complicate decentralized scheduling. This paper proposes \emph{MAS-DecStream}, whose main contribution is \emph{LLM-MR-CNP}: an extension of the classical Contract Net Protocol with semantic CFP formulation, progressive context disclosure, multi-round proposal revision, negotiation memory, and deterministic validation. Edge-cluster agents refine natural-language offloading proposals from local observations, predicted resource states, and qualitative runtime context, while hard resource and QoS constraints remain deterministic. Experiments derived from the Alibaba ASI Trace evaluate the extension at three levels: single- versus multi-round CNP, rule-based versus LLM-assisted refinement, and fixed-model single- versus multi-round negotiation. Under the evaluated configurations, MAS-DecStream reduces latency violations to 3\%, eliminates resource overcommitment, reaches a conflict-resolution rate of 0.91 with 20 agents, and improves utility by up to 22\% over the multi-round rule-based baseline. A separate 25-case evaluation shows model- and prompt-dependent accuracy--cost trade-offs. The results provide initial evidence that multi-round CNP refinement is the principal protocol-level gain, with LLM assistance adding value for qualitative and uncertain runtime context.
Autonomous vehicles offload latency-sensitive perception tasks to nearby mobile edge computing (MEC) servers, where a missed safety-critical task is unsafe rather than merely degraded. Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly proposed as adaptive, explainable schedulers, yet evidence of when they help is scarce. We study deadline-aware, mixed-criticality scheduling on heterogeneous MEC servers, where time-critical (TC) tasks must be protected at a controlled cost to best-effort traffic, and ask whether a multi-agent LLM control layer improves on a strong heuristic. We answer in two steps. First we build the heuristic: a windowed contract-net auction that orders each admission window time-critical-first by earliest deadline and places tasks by earliest-finish-time. Across 60 instances on three topologies and 15 baselines under an identical online constraint, it attains a TC completion rate of 0.902, above every baseline (Holm-corrected p<0.001; best baseline 0.838) and at 0.87 of a CP-SAT upper bound. Second, we add the LLM control plane. A controlled decomposition traces the scheduler's advantage to two ordinary factors, the batching horizon and time-critical-first ordering; the auction, the per-window LLM policy, and online adaptation add nothing while the load is stationary, where the heuristic is already near-optimal. Under a mid-run surge of safety-critical tasks the picture changes, and the LLM control plane gains significantly over both the static heuristic and the bandit. LLM orchestration therefore earns its cost only when non-stationarity opens headroom a fixed policy cannot use. We report control-plane latency and rationale, and release all code and seeded instances.