Sep 2026· Journal of experimental psychology. General· Vol 155, pp. 2151 - 2160· 0 citations
Medicine
Abstract
In language, word order can be used to help disambiguate the grammatical category (noun, verb, etc.) to which an unfamiliar or ambiguous word belongs. We have recently demonstrated that the order of stimuli impacts how ambiguous stimuli are subsequently categorized, even in a nonlinguistic context. However, it remains possible that participants may linguistically recode these stimuli (i.e., giving abstract shapes ‘names’), such that this effect is still based in the language system. Here, we adapted our previous non-linguistic paradigm assessing the impact of sequence order on categorization, but with the addition of two interference conditions: one interfering with phonological systems of linguistic re-coding, and the other with visuospatial memory. We found that while the non-linguistic, visuospatial interference task had no impact on the sequence categorization effect, the linguistic interference task substantially reduced this effect. These results suggest that even though the task uses nonlinguistic stimuli, participants appeared to recode this information linguistically, and thus that this effect may be a feature of language, rather than a more domain-general cognitive process.
Theories of the mental lexicon must explain how people use context to interpret ambiguous words (e.g., "internal organ" vs. "musical organ") and why people vary on this core aspect of comprehension. Theoretical development has been hampered by the lack of reliable tests of disambiguation skill. We introduce a task in w...
L. M. Blott, A. Gowenlock, A. J. Parker et al.· Quarterly Journal of Experim...· 0 citations
Language is vastly ambiguous, yet in context our brains resolve ambiguity effortlessly. This is particularly evident at the lexical level: Although most words can convey a wide range of related meanings, humans rapidly and automatically select the one appropriate for the context. We investigated the neural mechanisms u...
Simone M. Krogh, L. Pylkkänen· bioRxiv· 0 citations
The traditional distinction between content and function words continues to underpin much psycholinguistic research, even though other areas of linguistics have long recognized it as problematic (e.g. Bennis et al., 1983, and Ishkhanyan et al., 2017 within aphasiology; Diessel, 1999: 150–153, and Bisang, 2010: 291 with...
Solvej Wilbrandt Jaeger, Kasper Boye· Journal of Psycholinguistic...· 0 citations
In language, not only do sentence meanings depend on how words are structured together, but word meanings also depend on their roles in the structure. While we have some understanding of how the brain grasps complex meanings built from simpler parts, we know far less about how linguistic structure reshapes the meanings...
Simone M. Krogh, L. Pylkkänen· bioRxiv· 0 citations
Readers find it difficult to reject ungrammatical sentences with two adjacent words transposed (e.g. I met my friend kind at the station), and they sometimes misclassify such sentences as grammatical—a phenomenon known as the transposed word effect. According to the parallel processing model, readers simultaneously pro...