Skip to content
Open access

Can a Positive Social Discount Rate Be Fair to the Future? On the Primacy of Practical Reason

Jul 2026 · Ethics, Politics & Society · Vol 9 · 0 citations

Abstract

In the paper I argue that social discounting of the future fails, in more general terms, because by focusing on existence or time distance, neglects the fact that future generations are participants in the same chain of human succession. Making use of Gosseries’ discussion in the book What is Intergenerational Justice? I argue that existence and time distance are morally irrelevant factors, because human succession is mapped on the structure of our practical rationality, and particularly on the notion of valuing per se. By criticizing Gosseries’ insistence on impartiality, I argue first that valuing is a diachronic enterprise that necessitates the fact that human generations should exist, something that creates certain duties of sufficientarian justice. Second, I argue that valuing is also a synchronic enterprise, unveiled in our attachment to fellow people that interact with us in the here and now, something that also creates special duties of justice to them.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Book Sep 2026

The Subjectivity of Value

This book is a sustained attack on the claim that values are objective, in the world independent of people’s attitudes. It evaluates this claim in different value domains: moral, personal or prudential, aesthetic, and general evaluative. The first section greatly expands on J.L. Mackie’s appeal to moral disagreement...

Alan H. Goldman · 0 citations
Book 2018

Partial Values

When, if ever, is it permissible to afford special consideration to friends and family? How can we strive to be objective in our thinking, and is this always a feasible or appropriate aim? This book examines the categories of impartiality and objectivity by showing how they frame certain debates in epistemology, moral...

DeLapp Kevin · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Fairness from an Economist’s Perspective. John Rawls versus Robert Nozick

The article is devoted to a comparative analysis of the theories of justice by John Rawls and Robert Nozick from the perspective of economic science. The choice of these concepts is due to their fundamental differences, which allow for identifying and assessing the risks of economic consequences that may arise from the...

E. Skarzhinskaya, V. Tsurikov · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Mises on rationality, calculation and collective choice: A reassessment.

This article examines an apparent tension in the writings of Ludwig von Mises, who claims that (1) all human actions are rational and that (2) rational economic activity in the socialist economy is impossible. It is argued that the tension dissolves once it is recognized that in the context (1), Mises employs a non-nor...

DA Megger · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

(Mis)conceptualizing the Future: On the Temporality of the Future in Rights-Based Climate Litigation

Discourses on future generations have been of increasing interest to legal scholarship and practice in recent years. This article aims to make sense of the temporal complexities involved in those discourses. Drawing on Hans Lindahl’s critical phenomenology of legal ordering, I argue that the representational dynami...

Bent Bos · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

The Irony of Free Will: the Cultural Evolution of a Confusing Concept

This paper reconceptualizes free will as a concept that evolved culturally as a justification for our moral practices. Such a justification becomes relevant when people consider the possibility that human behaviour results from causes rather than reasons. Such a causal story might imply that our actions lie beyond ou...

Stefaan Blancke, M. Sie · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.