Speech perception relies on multiple acoustic cues whose relative weighting varies across languages. The present study examines how long-term language experience shapes cue weighting in second-language (L2) speech perception, refining an attentional-learning account of cross-linguistic transfer. Native speakers of English, Dutch, Spanish, Korean, and Mandarin completed a cue-weighting task targeting English lexical stress, in which vowel quality, pitch, and duration were orthogonally manipulated. Results revealed robust, dimension-specific differences across first-language (L1) groups that could not be explained solely by the presence or absence of lexical stress or lexical tone in the L1. Instead, cue weighting reflected how acoustic dimensions function within the L1 cue ecology, including their relative contribution to lexical distinctions and the stability and interpretability of these mappings across contexts. Cue redundancy constrained relative cue strength without eliminating attentional sensitivity to secondary dimensions. Machine-learning classification further showed that L1-linked attentional profiles were sufficiently structured to support prediction, even among L2 listeners with substantial English proficiency, demonstrating the persistence of L1-shaped attentional tuning. These findings support a view of cue weighting as reflecting durable, multidimensional attentional priors shaped by long-term experience and highlight the importance of L1 cue ecologies in understanding cross-linguistic transfer in speech perception.
Although attention control has been proposed as a potentially relevant source of individual variation in speech perception, its association with nonnative segmental discrimination remains underexplored. The present study investigates whether individual differences in self-reported trait attentional control are associ...
G. P. Georgiou, Wen-Jun Zhang· Second Language Research· 0 citations
This study investigates how monolingual listeners evaluate the perceived nativeness of bilingual speech in the
first (L1) and second language (L2), and which pronunciation cues underlie these judgments. English and German listeners rated the
L1/L2 speech produced by L1 English-L2 German late bilinguals, alongside m...
L. Kornder· Journal of Second Language P...· 0 citations
In cocktail party-type environments, listeners must segregate simultaneous acoustic sources and select one for processing. Behavioral studies have established that both low-level voice differences (e.g., pitch) and high-level linguistic differences (e.g., word content) aid these processes. Electroencephalography (EEG)...
Sahil Luthra, Eric Parker, Marysia Brown et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
Introduction Speech perception in adverse listening environments depends not only on the quality of the acoustic signal but also on listeners’ ability to recruit higher-level linguistic information. Although semantic constraints are known to influence recognition of syntactically complex speech, it remains unclear how...
Jing Shen, G. DeDe· Frontiers in Psychology· 0 citations
Understanding how native speakers and second language (L2) learners process language differently is fundamental to theories of language acquisition, comprehension, and use. A central debate in this literature concerns the inconsistent findings in emotional prosody processing between native speakers and L2 learners, par...
This study investigates how lexical frequency, behavioural task, and gender shape phonetic accommodation, focusing on speakers' adoption of an alternative pronunciation variant of the German adjectival suffix -ig. Partially overlapping groups of 30–31 native speakers of German completed two experimental tasks: a shadow...
Mitko Sabev, Ivan Yuen, Bistra Andreeva et al.· Frontiers in Psychology· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.