Skip to content
Review Open access

A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Neurofeedback for Training of Attention and Related Cognitive Functions

Jul 2026 · Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience · Vol 24, pp. 470 - 479 · 0 citations · 35 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Given the limited evidence available to date, current evidence remains insufficient to draw robust conclusions regarding the therapeutic effectiveness of fMRI-NF, andeterogeneity was greater for the secondary outcomes than for the primary outcome.

Abstract

Objective This meta-analysis investigated the effects of functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback (fMRI-NF) on inattention and cognitive dysfunctions. Methods Using the keywords “fMRI neurofeedback” and “attention,” randomized controlled trials were identified from major electronic databases from inception to June 2024. Outcomes were expressed as standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results Five studies including 214 participants (mean age = 16.8 years) were analyzed. The median number of fMRI-NF sessions was four (range 3−15), and the median follow-up duration was three weeks (range 1−10 weeks). Stimulation sites included the right inferior frontal gyrus (n = 2), right anterior insular cortex (n = 1), dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (n = 1), and an individualized approach (n = 1). The primary analysis showed no significant difference in inattention improvement between the fMRI-NF and control groups (SMD = 0.17, 95% CI −0.15 to 0.49, p = 0.30; four studies, 153 participants). Secondary outcomes also showed no significant intergroup differences, including vigilance (SMD = 0.08, 95% CI −0.49 to 0.65, p = 0.79), inhibition (SMD = −0.68, 95% CI −2.11 to 0.74, p = 0.35), and processing speed (SMD = −0.56, 95% CI −1.38 to 0.27, p = 0.19). Heterogeneity was greater for the secondary outcomes than for the primary outcome, with I2 values of 49% for vigilance, 90% for inhibition, and 79% for processing speed, compared with 0% for the primary outcome. Conclusion Given the limited evidence available to date, current evidence remains insufficient to draw robust conclusions regarding the therapeutic effectiveness of fMRI-NF.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Sep 2026

Modulation of cognitive and motor functions by temporal interference stimulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and variability

Temporal interference stimulation (TIS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique proposed to focally modulate both cortical and subcortical brain regions. A growing number of human studies have examined its effects on cognitive and motor performance, but inconsistent findings across heterogeneous protocols leave i...

Samaneh Aziziaram, A. Fromm, I. Violante et al. · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

Efficacy and safety of noninvasive brain stimulation for ADHD: a systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blind randomized controlled trials across international English and Chinese databases.

BACKGROUND This meta-analysis and systematic review updates and evaluates the efficacy and safety of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques for treating clinical symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), including original studies from China to improve the generalizability of the findings....

Hui-Ru Cui, Guo-Sheng Wang, Shu-Ying Wang et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Real-time fMRI neurofeedback of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex to enhance emotional cognitive control: A randomized controlled trial.

Real-time fMRI neurofeedback (rt-fMRI-nf) is an endogenous neuromodulation approach whereby individuals are taught to self-regulate their own neural activity in the moment. Cognitive control in emotional contexts is related to risk for or protection against mental health disorders, such as depression, anxiety, or postt...

T. McDermott, A. Tsuchiyagaito, Samaniego Ramírez et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Comparative efficacy of neuromodulation techniques for Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background Neuromodulation techniques (NMTs) have shown potential therapeutic value in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), but the comparative efficacy of different modalities remains unclear. This study aimed to systematically compare and rank available NMTs to identify their relative benefits across cognitive, functional, and...

Yuan Liu, Shi-Yu Liu, Hua-Yu Yan et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Effects and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on cognitive outcomes in mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique that has been increasingly investigated as a potential treatment for mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, its clinical efficacy remains uncertain due to heterogeneous findings across studies. Methods A system...

Hua Ren, Jian Jiao, Xin-Ru Lan et al. · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

Efficacy and neural mechanisms of transcranial direct current stimulation for social function in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES To evaluate the intervention effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on social functioning and neurophysiological indicators in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), and to explore neuro-behavioral consistency at the individual and cross-study levels. METHODS Following the PRISMA guidelines, we...

Han-Ying Zhao, Hao-Miao Niu, Yi Jiang et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.