This project developed the Large Language Human Machine: an embodied, “black box” device that prints cryptic, ritualistic instructions for the user to perform, Inspired by instruction-based performance art, the project treats instruction as a design material to expose shifting dynamics of authority, opacity, and agency.
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) are often framed as a tool to be “prompted” where humans command, and the machine operates. However, as AI becomes increasingly intermeshed in our lives, role divisions blur, and humans take the role of interpreting and carrying out machine instructions. This project explores the concept of Large Language Humans (LLHs), describing this role reversal where humans become the operators of AI logic. Using a Research-through-Design (RtD) approach, we developed the Large Language Human Machine: an embodied, “black box” device that prints cryptic, ritualistic instructions for the user to perform. Inspired by instruction-based performance art (e.g., Yoko Ono, John Cage), the project treats instruction as a design material to expose shifting dynamics of authority, opacity, and agency. We document the iterative process from screen-based prototypes to a self-contained physical artifact. By viewing this process through four design parameters: persistence, tempo, uncertainty, and opacity, we discuss how materializing instructions as physical “receipts” reconfigures the user’s commitment to the machine’s agency.
System prompts are the primary lever practitioners use to control language model behavior, yet what they actually do to the computation inside the transformer remains poorly understood. Across 17 instruction-tuned models spanning 8 architecture families and 1.5B to 72B parameters, we use Centered Kernel Alignment (CKA)...
Recent advances in generative artificial intelligence and large language models (LLMs) have increased the feasibility of translating natural-language instructions into executable robot programs, reducing the technical barrier separating shop-floor operators from industrial robotic programming. However, current evalua...
Beatriz Consciência, Ricardo Correia, C. Wanzeller· AI Computer Science and Robo...· 0 citations
We present GenLimitLib, a source-aligned Lean 4 library for language generation in the limit. Introduced by Kleinberg and Mullainathan at NeurIPS 2024, language generation in the limit studies a theoretical question motivated by LLMs: how to generate valid new strings from observed examples. This young and rapidly evol...
Comparing AI with animals, aliens, and deities is highlighted, highlighting both the promise and the limits of extending the authors' concepts of mind and meaning beyond the human case.
The paper examines whether AI-generated texts can serve as authentic input when engaged through three stages: interaction with text, decoding and interpretation of meaning, and contextually appropriate response production, and considers the dual role of AI as both a source of linguistic input and a mediation tool suppo...
Mehran Esfandiari, Mir Wais Gawhary· International Journal of Eng...· 0 citations
Modal auxiliaries such as must, should, and have to mark necessity and obligation within the contexts of speaker authority and interpersonal stance. We examine whether large language models (LLMs) reproduce contemporary human patterns of deontic modal usage. Across three primary corpora, an external benchmark, two cont...
Daniel Hart, Sarah Allred, Joseph Abbas et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.