Skip to content
Open access

When AI-First Becomes Democracy-Last: The European Commission’s Digital Omnibus and Its Technosolutionism on Steroids

Jul 2026 · European Journal of Risk Regulation · pp. 1-15 · 0 citations

TL;DR

It is argued that the Digital Omnibus is not merely a neutral legislative technique aimed at simplification, but a device for producing institutional imaginaries that reconfigure the normative foundations of EU digital governance.

Abstract

In November 2025, the European Commission made a substantive proposal to meaningfully water down existing EU digital legislation in relation to Artificial Intelligence (AI) as part of the Digital Omnibus package. This article specifically examines the Digital Omnibus package in relation to AI, and asks: What is the underlying socio-technical imaginary on AI embedded in the European Commission’s Digital Omnibus initial proposal? Situated within the broader proliferation of omnibus legislation in the EU, we argue that the Digital Omnibus is not merely a neutral legislative technique aimed at simplification, but a device for producing institutional imaginaries that reconfigure the normative foundations of EU digital governance. Hence, the Digital Omnibus package contributes to rearticulate what counts as a desirable European future and which democratic or rights-based costs become acceptable in its name. Our analysis exemplifies how the post-regulatory state operates not by formally dismantling the EU’s regulatory architecture, but by reconfiguring it from within. The Commission’s socio-technical imaginary normalises the data extractivist model according to which the EU can only join the “AI race” if it lowers its democratic and fundamental rights standards. It therefore operates as an instrument of accelerated technosolutionism that reshapes the constitutional balance between democracy, protection of rights, procedural integrity and industrial competitiveness.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access 2026

Towards an integrated European digital ecosystem. Digital Omnibus, Data Act, AI Act and the protection of human beings in data governance and Artificial Intelligence

The recent evolution of the European Union’s regulatory framework on data, artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, and digital identity reveals a process of profound institutional transformation, one that goes far beyond the technical dimension of innovation to take on the characteristics of a true constitutional repos...

A. Uricchio, Claudio Caldarola · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

CETS 225 and Digital Constitutionalism: The Asymmetric and Multilevel Governance of Algorithmic Power

This commentary examines the Council of Europe's Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law (CETS 225), the first legally binding international treaty on artificial intelligence, opened for signature in Vilnius on September 5, 2024. It argues that CETS 225 articulate...

Pedro Miguel Ángel Garita Arce · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Simplification or Deregulation? The Digital Omnibus and the Silent Erosion of B2B Protections in the Digital Single Market

In November 2025, the European Commission presented the Digital Omnibus Proposal as the legislative core of its broader Digital Package on Simplification – an initiative forming part of a series of Omnibus packages ostensibly aimed at reducing administrative burdens and boosting competitiveness. A crucial but overloo...

G. Smorto · 0 citations

UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Shared responsibility, unequal power Mapping the limitations of multi-stakeholderism in EU’s digital governance

It is argued that pursuing strategic autonomy, as the European Union boasts, requires reducing material power asymmetries, and shows that, despite the promises of multi-stakeholderism for more democratic and cooperative governance configurations, in practice this approach often disregards material power asymmetries.

Unknown authors · 0 citations

UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Shared responsibility, unequal power Mapping the limitations of multi-stakeholderism in EU’s digital governance

It is argued that pursuing strategic autonomy, as the European Union boasts, requires reducing material power asymmetries, and shows that, despite the promises of multi-stakeholderism for more democratic and cooperative governance configurations, in practice this approach often disregards material power asymmetries.

Unknown authors · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

(Non-)Regression in EU Lawmaking: the Sustainability Omnibus as a Turning Point?

This article examines the Sustainability Omnibus as a potential turning point in EU lawmaking through the lens of the emerging principle of non-regression in environmental law. It argues that the Omnibus not only amends the central pillars of the EU sustainability framework but also reflects a shift in how such ref...

Erriketi Tla da Silva · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.