Skip to content
Open access

MACHINE LEARNING-BASED PREDICTION OF BREAST CANCER RECURRENCE

Jul 2026 · Jurnal Biometrika dan Kependudukan · Vol 15, pp. 86-96 · 0 citations · 44 references

TL;DR

Logistic regression demonstrated the most reliable predictive performance for this dataset, and future research should use larger, diverse datasets and incorporate a broader range of predictors, including imaging and genomic data, to optimize the benefits of more complex machine learning models.

Abstract

Breast cancer recurrence remains a major cause of mortality among women worldwide. Early identification is essential for improving patient outcomes, and prediction modelling has emerged as an approach to support this objective. This study aimed to develop and compare machine learning models for predicting breast cancer recurrence. A retrospective secondary analysis was conducted on data from 286 patients in the University of California, Irvine (UCI) Machine Learning Repository. Nine predictors were used to develop logistic regression (LR), artificial neural network (ANN), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) models. The dataset was split into training and testing sets using a 70:30 ratio. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC), Brier score, and calibration analysis, with 95% confidence intervals estimated through bootstrap resampling. LR demonstrated the best discriminatory performance, achieving a test AUC of 0.790. In contrast, XGBoost and ANN showed lower generalization performance, with test AUCs of 0.727 and 0.748, respectively. LR also achieved the highest testing recall (0.731) and F1-score (0.623), indicating superior sensitivity for identifying recurrent cases. Meanwhile, XGBoost demonstrated the highest precision (0.727), accuracy (0.756), and calibration performance. The relatively small sample size and reliance on structured clinical predictors may have contributed to the superior performance of LR in this study. In conclusion, LR demonstrated the most reliable predictive performance for this dataset.  Future research should use larger, diverse datasets and incorporate a broader range of predictors, including imaging and genomic data, to optimize the benefits of more complex machine learning models.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access 2026

Spearman-guided XGBoost Classification for Breast Cancer Diagnosis Using the Wisconsin Diagnostic Dataset

A comprehensive Machine Learning framework that employs k-Nearest Neighbors, Random Forest, Logistic Regression, and Extreme Gradient Boosting algorithms to analyze a breast cancer dataset obtained from the UCI repository underscores the potential of ML-driven approaches in enhancing breast cancer diagnostics and contr...

Hani Attar, Jafar Ababneh, Waleed Alomoush et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Machine learning models for predicting liver cancer: a real-world cohort study in China

The findings support the feasibility of leveraging large-scale inpatient laboratory data for risk-stratification model development and show good discrimination and interpretability for liver cancer prediction in a hospitalized real-world cohort using routinely available clinical and laboratory data.

Ce-Xiong Fu, Fang Li, Shi-Bing Li et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Comparative Analysis of Decision Tree, Random Forest, SVM, Logistic Regression and XGBoost for Cervical Cancer Risk Prediction

Cervical cancer remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality among women worldwide, particularly in low- and middle-income countries where access to early screening and diagnosis is limited. Accurate prediction of cervical cancer threat using machine learning techniques can support early intervention,...

Agwu Joy Nneka, Ituma Chinagolum · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Lung cancer risk prediction using interpretable ensemble models on lifestyle and clinical data

The results suggest that stacking-based ensembles can improve risk prediction from lifestyle and clinical indicators while maintaining model transparency through SHAP and LIME explanations, highlighting the potential of interpretable ensemble learning as a decision-support tool for lung cancer risk assessment.

Shahid Mohammad Ganie, P. K. Dutta Pramanik, Zhong-Ming Zhao · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

High-Dimensional Breast Cancer Classification: Evaluating Trade-offs Between Accuracy, Robustness, and Computational Cost

Background: Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in females, with 2.3 million new cases diagnosed annually. Machine learning (ML) algorithms have the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy through the analysis of high-dimensional data. However, the lack of standardized benchmarks across diff...

Ali A. Hamad, Naaman Omar · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Predicting prostate cancer mortality using UK Biobank data: a multimodal machine learning approach.

Prostate cancer remains a major cause of cancer-related mortality among men worldwide; however, it remains challenging to predict disease progression in individuals. While numerous tools attempt to forecast the likelihood of developing the cancer, fewer studies focus specifically on mortality prediction using populatio...

Shwas Churi, Bodhayan Prasad, B. Jani · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.