Jul 2026· IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems· pp. 1-7· 0 citations· 24 references
Abstract
Fairness and bias concerns in AI systems arise when predictive models amplify inequities present in data, and measurement processes. Traditional fairness analysis approaches such as demographic parity, equalized odds, and individual fairness primarily operate on statistical associations and often struggle when protected attributes influence features through complex causal pathways. This paper explores causal inference modelling for identification and mitigation of fairness and bias issues in AI system. The proposed framework integrates structural causal models (SCMs) with an explainable AI method, Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) to provide interpretations to the AI system outcomes. The framework introduces structural causal modelling with counterfactual queries for the analysis of sources of fairness and bias through the protected variables. The framework is experimented on a synthetic loan application dataset with the results showing the effects of protected attributes (race and gender) on credit approval rates. The models also achieve average AUC score of 70% on the dataset.
This study explores the potential of counterfactual explanations to assess artificial intelligence (AI) fairness, especially in critical decision-making systems. Predictive models may amplify biases inherent in data sets or algorithms, and given the absence of a universally accepted fairness metric, a case-specific app...
Federico Sabbatini, Roberta Calegari· AI and Ethics· 0 citations
Fairness assessment in algorithmic decisions that affect individuals, such as credit scoring, often relies on parity measures calculated at the aggregate group level. Such measures may not reveal which individuals experience unfairness or which explanatory factors contribute to it. In this paper, we propose a rank-base...
The approach builds on the assumptions of the standard fairness model recently proposed by Pleˇcko and Bareinboim, enabling a principled evaluation of fairness in terms of causal effects, particularly as the complexity of the data structures increases.
Alessia Berarducci, Eric Rossetto, Alessandro Antonucci et al.· 0 citations
Persistent demographic parity disparity among the more complex models is consistent with feature-level bias that no model architecture can resolve, and has direct implications for the less-discriminatory-alternatives framework under US fair lending law and for the high-risk classification of credit scoring AI under the...
Colin Ellis· Journal of Risk and Financia...· 0 citations
The empirical findings support the use of complementary structural and policy-level interventions and demonstrate the importance of jointly evaluating aggregate disparity, worst-case attribute-level harm, cross-attribute transfer, and predictive utility.
Transformer models such as LegalBERT are increasingly used in legal decision support, raising concerns about both fairness and the transparency of model explanations. These properties are usually evaluated separately, leaving open whether a debiasing intervention that changes fairness also changes how faithfully explan...
Yasmina El Kacemi, S. S. M. Ziabari, A. M. Alsahag· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.