Skip to content
Review Open access

Clear aligner therapy for adult anterior open bite: a systematic review, descriptive evidence map, and certainty appraisal of reported dentoskeletal changes

Jul 2026 · BMC Oral Health · Vol 26 · 0 citations · 34 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Very low-certainty evidence suggests that selected adult anterior open-bite cases treated with clear aligners may show overbite improvement, however, the available evidence is insufficient to confirm predictable skeletal correction or to validate a single mechanism of bite closure.

Abstract

Clear aligner therapy is increasingly used for adult anterior open-bite correction, but the certainty of evidence, reported dentoskeletal changes, and clinical boundaries of this approach remain unclear. This systematic review aimed to summarize overbite change and descriptively map the dentoskeletal findings reported in the current clinical literature. This systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA. PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were searched. Reference lists of included studies and relevant reviews were also checked, but no additional eligible records were identified. Eligible studies evaluated adult or predominantly adult cohorts with anterior open bite treated with clear aligners and reported overbite change or dentoskeletal outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I and RoB 2. Reported dentoskeletal findings were classified as direct, indirect, or insufficient evidence for mechanistic interpretation. Exploratory single-arm random-effects meta-analyses were performed when extractable completed-treatment data were available. Certainty of evidence was appraised using GRADE principles. Ten clinical studies involving 421 aligner-treated participants were included. Most studies were retrospective and nonrandomized, and nine had serious overall risk of bias. The primary exploratory synthesis of five completed-treatment cohorts showed a pooled overbite increase of 3.07 mm, while an extended sensitivity analysis of seven studies yielded 2.89 mm. Heterogeneity was substantial. Reported dentoskeletal changes most commonly involved anterior dentoalveolar changes, variable posterior vertical change, and limited mandibular plane change. Most studies were not designed to test mechanisms directly; therefore, the dentoskeletal findings were interpreted cautiously. The certainty of evidence was very low. Very low-certainty evidence suggests that selected adult anterior open-bite cases treated with clear aligners may show overbite improvement. However, the available evidence is insufficient to confirm predictable skeletal correction or to validate a single mechanism of bite closure. Future studies should use prospective comparative designs, standardized anterior open-bite phenotyping, direct component-level outcome assessment, blinded evaluation, and long-term retention endpoints. CRD420261376480

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Sep 2026

Clinical Outcomes of Sequential Distalization with Clear Aligners: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background/Objectives: Sequential distalization with clear aligners is increasingly used as a non-extraction approach for correcting Class II and selected Class III malocclusions. However, evidence remains heterogeneous regarding treatment protocols, anchorage strategies, and clinical outcomes. This systematic review a...

M. Baxmann, Márton Zsoldos, Krisztina Kárpáti · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Do Simplified Complete Denture Protocols Preserve Patient-Reported Outcomes? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND Conventional complete dentures (CDs) fabrication involves multiple clinical and laboratory steps. Simplified protocols reduce treatment burden. However, their impact on patient-reported outcomes remains debated. OBJECTIVE This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the oral health-related quality of...

Goes Timbó Isabelle da Costa, Sarah Vitória Lutif de Lemos Moura, Yuri Barbosa de Azevêdo et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

In-Office Clear Aligner Therapy in Orthodontics: A Systematic Review of Digital Workflows, Clinical Effectiveness and Cost-Efficiency

Objective: To systematically review and appraise the available evidence regarding the clinical effectiveness, digital workflows, manufacturing processes and cost-efficiency of in-office clear aligner therapy compared with commercially outsourced aligner systems and conventional fixed orthodontic appliances. Methods: A...

Amilkar Cárdenas · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Short and long-term skeletal and dental effects of the mandibular anterior repositioning appliance in Class II malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives. This systematic review assessed the skeletal and dental effects produced by the Mandibular Anterior Repositioning Appliance (MARA) in growing patients with Class II malocclusion and mandibular retrusion, examining both immediate and long-term treatment outcomes. Material and methods. A comprehensive electro...

Shubhnita Verma, A. Thakur, Pasupureddi Keerthana et al. · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Effectiveness of aligners to correct vertical malocclusions in adult patients : Systematic review.

The results of individual studies suggest that aligners could be a viable technique for the correction of mild to moderate open bite with good vertical control in contrast to deep bite malocclusions where treatment efficacy is still limited.

Hajar Ben Mohimd, Houda Neani, F. Zaoui et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.