Aug 2026· Journal of clinical pharmacology· Vol 66· 0 citations· 115 references
Medicine
TL;DR
A narrative review integrates pathophysiological rationale, comparative pharmacology of all FXI‐targeting classes, trial evidence, and patient stratification, providing an up‐to‐date reference for FXI/FXIa inhibition in secondary ischemic stroke prevention.
Abstract
Ischemic stroke remains a leading cause of death and disability worldwide, and bleeding (particularly intracranial hemorrhage) continues to limit conventional antithrombotic therapy in secondary prevention, even with direct oral anticoagulants. Factor XI (FXI) has emerged as a promising target: it amplifies thrombin generation and stabilizes pathological thrombi while contributing only marginally to physiological hemostasis, as illustrated by the mild bleeding phenotype of congenital FXI deficiency. This biological dissociation underpins the concept of hemostasis‐sparing anticoagulation. Three pharmacological classes are being studied, with distinct pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and drug‐drug interaction profiles: small‐molecule oral FXIa inhibitors (asundexian and milvexian), FXI antisense oligonucleotides (fesomersen), and monoclonal antibodies targeting FXI/FXIa (abelacimab and osocimab). Oral small molecules offer rapid, reversible target engagement particularly suited to chronic cerebrovascular prevention. While phase II trials (PACIFIC‐Stroke, AXIOMATIC‐SSP) showed neutral primary endpoints with reassuring safety, the phase III OCEANIC‐STROKE trial demonstrated that asundexian 50 mg once daily, added to antiplatelet therapy, reduced recurrent ischemic stroke by 26% (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.65–0.84) without significant bleeding excess in non‐cardioembolic stroke; the ongoing LIBREXIA‐STROKE is testing milvexian 25 mg twice daily in a similar setting. Conversely, OCEANIC‐AF showed that FXIa inhibition alone is insufficient versus apixaban in atrial fibrillation, indicating dependence upon clinical setting and suggesting the need for a precision‐medicine approach integrating clinical, imaging, and biomarker‐based patient stratification. This narrative review integrates pathophysiological rationale, comparative pharmacology of all FXI‐targeting classes, trial evidence, and patient stratification, providing an up‐to‐date reference for FXI/FXIa inhibition in secondary ischemic stroke prevention.
Ischemic stroke remains a leading contributor to global mortality and long-term disability, while bleeding complications, particularly intracranial hemorrhage, continue to constrain the use of conventional antithrombotic therapies for secondary prevention. Factor XI (FXI) has emerged as an attractive therapeutic target...
Rami A. Al-Horani· ACS Pharmacology & Translati...· 0 citations
Cardiovascular diseases remain the leading global cause of morbidity and mortality, and thrombotic events contribute substantially to their clinical burden. Established anticoagulants, including vitamin K antagonists and direct oral anticoagulants, reduce thromboembolic events but remain limited by bleeding risk in sel...
Zhao-Wei Zhu, W. Gong, Xin-Qun Hu et al.· Vessel Plus· 0 citations
A pattern emerges, where FXI/FXIa inhibition offers a favorable safety profile across multiple settings and high-risk subgroups, yet clear efficacy has so far been established only in secondary prevention of noncardioembolic ischemic stroke over existing antiplatelet strategies.
Ermioni Oikonomou, Mark Goldin, A. Spyropoulos· Journal of Clinical Medicine· 0 citations
Thromboembolic diseases impose a significant burden on global health. However, the currently approved anticoagulant drugs, including heparin, vitamin K antagonists, and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), all carry certain bleeding risks. The proteases inhibited by these drugs play crucial roles in both pathological th...
Hui Yuan, Yuan-Yuan He, Mao Zhang et al.· Frontiers in Immunology· 0 citations
Potential causes of breakthrough ischemic stroke are identifiable in about half of breakthrough strokes and are associated with higher risk of recurrence compared with those without, warranting individualized approaches.
Federico De Santis, Matteo Foschi, Francesca Gabriele et al.· Journal of Neurology· 0 citations