Skip to content
Preprint

Tabular Deep Learning for Algorithmic Trading: Cross-Regime Bayesian Optimisation for Equity Signal Generation

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 66 references
Computer Science Economics

TL;DR

No individual tabular deep learning architecture outperforms gradient-boosted trees, but combining XGBoost and TabNet using rank aggregation produces a Hybrid ensemble with an annualised return of 51.26%, a Sharpe ratio of 2.44, and a statistically significant CAPM alpha of 0.423.

Abstract

Algorithmic trading now represents a market exceeding $20 billion, where even marginal gains in signal robustness can translate into economically significant returns. Existing evaluations of equity prediction models do not explicitly target regime robustness during hyperparameter selection. Five model classes are trained on daily observations from approximately 300 large-cap US equities over eleven years, with Bayesian optimisation configured to target trading performance across three statistically different market regimes. Regime-robust hyperparameter selection is associated with out-of-sample generalisation, as signal precision remains above the random baseline across all four quarters of the test period, and portfolio performance slowly degrades under simulated input noise before collapsing beyond a defined threshold. No individual tabular deep learning architecture outperforms gradient-boosted trees, but combining XGBoost and TabNet using rank aggregation produces a Hybrid ensemble with an annualised return of 51.26%, a Sharpe ratio of 2.44, and a statistically significant CAPM alpha of 0.423 (p = 0.011). A near-zero beta indicates this outperformance is driven by stock selection, not market exposure. Alternative data plays a secondary role once technical and fundamental features are accounted for, as well as contributing more strongly on the short side than the long, and varies by model class. An interactive application makes these results explorable in real time, with live data integration the remaining step toward practical deployment.

View source

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Benchmarking deep reinforcement learning and classical models for portfolio optimization across market efficiency regimes

The results show that deep learning models perform best in highly efficient markets where signals are weak but consistent, and in moderately and least efficient markets, traditional strategies often achieve similar or better returns.

H. Sahu, Avishek Bhandari · 0 citations

To boost or not to boost? XGBoost and DCC-GARCH integration for mean-variance portfolio optimization

This study examines whether integrating machine learning-based return forecasting and dynamic covariance estimation into a mean-variance portfolio framework produces measurable improvements over a conventional benchmark. Three strategies are constructed and evaluated over a five-year out-of-sample window from January 2...

Gun Assavasopee · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Deep Reinforcement Learning for Equity Trading: Benchmarking Actor-Critic Methods with Forward Retraining

Consistently profitable trading is difficult because equity markets are noisy, non-stationary, and only partially predictable from historical data. We benchmark five deep reinforcement learning (DRL) actor-critic methods: A2C, PPO, DDPG, TD3, and SAC, that learn trading actions end-to-end from market states, and compar...

Bi-Cheng Wang, Xin-Yi Zhang · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Do Daily Adaptive Machine Learning Stock Rankings Survive Trading Costs? Evidence from Cross-Sectional Technical Signals

This study examines whether daily machine learning stock rankings based on technical information contain out-of-sample ordering information and whether that information can be converted into economically implementable returns. Using a dynamically screened Nasdaq source universe from 2021 to 2026, four XGBoost objective...

Ferdinantos Kottas · 0 citations
Open access 2026

Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Portfolio Optimisation and Algorithmic Trading: A Reproducible Pipeline with an Indian-Market Backtest

The lesson is deliberately sober: the physics supplies the correct allocation rule, a constant policy on a stable long-run premium is competitive with a sensible fixed mix and far gentler on drawdown than buy-and-hold, and the value that remains is almost entirely in estimating the inputs.

S. Satyanarayana · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.