Jul 2026· Journal of Communication Management· pp. 1-18· 1 citation· 44 references
TL;DR
A gap between professional and public expectations regarding AI use and responsible AI practices is revealed, and trust is identified as a central factor linking AI knowledge to positive evaluations of AI-assisted content across both audiences.
Abstract
This study explores the ethical and trust-related implications of artificial intelligence (AI) in strategic communication. It compares professional content creators (e.g. journalists, public relations (PR) practitioners and advertising practitioners) and content consumers, focusing on differences in AI knowledge, trust and attitudes toward responsible AI practices.
A quantitative survey examined participants’ AI knowledge, trust and support for responsible AI practices. Comparative and correlational analyses were then conducted to explore the intersections of these variables.
Greater AI knowledge correlated with higher trust and more positive perceptions of AI-generated content. However, creators, particularly those working in strategic communication, were less supportive of responsible AI practices. Consumers, despite lower AI knowledge, expressed stronger support for responsible AI practices. These findings reveal a gap between professional and public expectations regarding AI use and responsible AI practices.
This study integrates creator and consumer perspectives within a single framework, empirically demonstrating differences in support for responsible AI practices and identifying trust as a central factor linking AI knowledge to positive evaluations of AI-assisted content across both audiences. By positioning trust and user knowledge as key mechanisms, the study advances theorization of the transparency dilemma as a conditional process rather than a uniform effect.
The model proposes that neither competency alone is sufficient for responsible AI practice and that their combination enables public relations professionals to advocate not only for organizational publics, but for humanity as the emergent public of the AI age.
Introduction As the implementation of AI accelerates within organizations, concerns emerge about the ethicality of AI-driven systems and tools and the ways people use them. Although previous literature proposes numerous theories regarding how to develop and use AI ethically, questions remain about how users perceive th...
Rachel Detherage, S. Connelly· Frontiers in Artificial Inte...· 0 citations
Women frequently report lower levels of trust in artificial intelligence than men and express greater concerns regarding the use of this technology. Existing literature suggests several contributing factors, including gender bias in AI outputs, social concerns about professional judgment when relying on AI, women’s und...
Banu Buruk, B. Arda· KADEM Kadın Araştırmaları De...· 0 citations
A comparative, local government-centred model of public sector AI innovation is advanced by integrating experiential, cognitive, and perceptual dimensions, and offers novel insights into public support mechanisms for responsible local government AI.
Raveena Marasinghe, Tan Yigitcanlar, Rita Yi-man Li et al.· European Journal of Innovati...· 0 citations
The increasing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in recruitment has transformed traditional hiring practices by improving efficiency, reducing recruitment time, and supporting data-driven decision-making. Despite these advantages, concerns regarding fairness, accountability, and transparency in AI-enabled recrui...
Shaima Asharaf Ali, K. Parimalakanthi· International Journal of Cre...· 0 citations
The findings offer an empirically grounded basis for designing responsible AI integration frameworks in social services and conditionally endorse Large Language Models as decision-support instruments, contingent on transparency, ethical governance, and structured professional training.
Sora Pazer· American Journal of Human Ps...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.