Skip to content
Open access

Artificial Intelligence Can Direct Patients Toward a Complaint-specific Musculoskeletal Provider

Aug 2026 · Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · Vol 10 · 0 citations · 31 references
Medicine

TL;DR

LLMs showed potential to direct patients to local, specialized musculoskeletal providers based on their report, although the specific contact information was at times inaccurate.

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with musculoskeletal complaints often search online to identify an appropriate healthcare provider. With the increasing availability of large language models (LLMs), these artificial intelligence (AI) tools can direct patients to providers. This study evaluated the ability of LLMs to recommend appropriate providers based on representative patient musculoskeletal queries. Methods: Three LLMs (ChatGPT, DeepSeek, and Gemini) were prompted with standardized musculoskeletal queries for two US cities (Lynchburg, VA, and Trumbull, CT). Provider recommendations were considered appropriate if the physician was currently practicing in the requested location and specialized in the relevant area. Listed phone numbers were checked for accuracy. Descriptive statistics and Fisher exact tests were used to summarize findings. Results: The appropriateness of recommended providers differed across models with ChatGPT being most often appropriate (17/17, 100%) compared with Gemini (9/21, 43%) and DeepSeek (4/10, 40%), (P < 0.001). Of the 18 inappropriate recommendations, 13 (72%) were real providers in unrelated specialties and 5 (28%) were hallucinations, all from DeepSeek. Phone number accuracy differed significantly across models with Gemini being most accurate (5/6, 83%), outperforming both ChatGPT (6/9, 67%; P = 0.60) and DeepSeek (2/10, 20%; P = 0.04). Discussion: LLMs showed potential to direct patients to local, specialized musculoskeletal providers based on their report, although the specific contact information was at times inaccurate. As these tools evolve, providers should be aware of AI's ability to make provider recommendations and work to ensure the presentation of their contact information is accessible by these models as best possible.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Mar 2026

Can Large Language Models Identify When an Upper Extremity Problem Needs Nonurgent Attention? An Assessment of Multiple LLM Chatbots

The finding that LLMs can distinguish urgent from nonurgent upper extremity conditions suggests that artificial intelligence tools could help reduce unnecessary use of high-cost emergency services, allowing those resources to be reserved for patients who require timely care.

Jefferson Hunter, David C. Ring, Prakash Jayakumar · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Artificial Intelligence Answering Patient Questions About Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: Accuracy, Readability, and Clinical Utility.

It is suggested that AI chatbots may serve as useful adjunct educational tools for patients and caregivers within military healthcare systems, however, variability in expert interpretation and the potential for patient misinterpretation underscore the continued importance of clinician oversight when integrating AI-gene...

Michael G Johnston, William J Ferris, Harrison Diaz et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Evaluating the accuracy of artificial intelligence-generated patient counseling for vestibular schwannoma.

OBJECTIVE To compare the quality of Google, ChatGPT, and providers in answering common questions regarding vestibular schwannoma. METHODS Search engine frequency data was used to generate ten common patient questions regarding the etiology, diagnosis, and management of vestibular schwannoma. Answers to these question...

John M. Sommerfeldt, James J. Pierre, Jakob L. Fischer et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Diagnostic accuracy of multimodal large language models compared with oral medicine specialists: a benchmarking study in salivary gland diseases

This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of multimodal Large Language Models (LLMS), namely, ChatGPT-5, ChatGPT-4o, and Gemini Pro 2.5, with board-certified oral medicine specialists. In this retrospective diagnostic accuracy study, 300 histopathologically confirmed salivary gland disease cases served as the...

Fatma E. A. Hassanein, Yousra Ahmed, Asmaa Abou-Bakr et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Evaluating AI-Generated Tonsillectomy Guidance Against Clinical Practice Standards

Background/Objectives: Artificial intelligence (AI) tools are used in clinical education and patient communication. Concordance with American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation clinical practice guidelines (CPG) and overall readability remain poorly defined. Methods: Over 2 months, ChatGPT, Goog...

Hetal Lad, Shrey B. Shah, Shreeya R. Bahethi et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Evaluating the Consistency and Reliability of an AI Diagnostic Tool in Dermatology: A Comparison Between Patient- and Dermatologist-Presented Cases

Introduction: Large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT-4.1 are increasingly used for dermatologic self-guidance and clinical decision support. Objectives: To evaluate how patient- versus dermatologist-generated clinical descriptions, with and without photographs, influence the diagnostic performance and treatment r...

Ezgi Aktaş, Bahadır Biçer, Şeyma Gürbüz et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.