SoftMCC is a calibration-sensitive MCC-family selector with bounded stability and utility evidence, coupling an MCC-specific calibrated identity with a tie-aware, shared-pool selection protocol.
Abstract
Model selection for imbalanced binary classification often uses the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), but thresholding makes validation rankings threshold-dependent. SoftMCC is a post-training MCC validation framework on established probability-valued confusion counts, coupling an MCC-specific calibrated identity with a tie-aware, shared-pool selection protocol. Its core score is a covariance-normalized probability-label association, reduces exactly to MCC for hard predictions, and is Pearson-bounded. Under perfect population calibration it equals the Brier skill score with identical candidate ordering; outside that regime the gap does not identify calibration error. Across 18 settings with 12 duplicate-safe grouped repeats, SoftMCC attains the best stability mean rank (2.31) and highest mean tie-corrected Kendall's W (0.659), with a significant Friedman test (p=0.007); Nemenyi analysis separates it from AUPRC and MCC@0.5, while 14-source-family sensitivity retains only the latter. Selected-model utility shows no advantage. Three of six prespecified comparisons have negative mean test-MCC differences, only F1@best survives Holm correction (p=0.014), and the dataset-level test is not significant (p=0.117). Label permutation lowers mean W to 0.092; temperature scaling shifts SoftMCC rankings (mean Spearman 0.851) whereas rank-based and threshold-optimized metrics remain invariant. SoftMCC is a calibration-sensitive MCC-family selector with bounded stability and utility evidence.
Researchers using latent profile and latent class analysis (LPA/LCA) commonly assign individuals to their modal class without evaluating whether this simplification distorts reported class sizes, profile means, or high-severity subgroups. Existing classification-quality diagnostics-entropy, average posterior probabilit...
Xiao-Hui Chen, Si-Guang Chen, Chenglin Wang et al.· Educational and Psychologica...· 0 citations
Class-imbalance handling is routinely evaluated on a single benchmark dataset, and the resulting conclusions are reported as if they were properties of the method, and it is shown this practice is unsafe and, for a well-calibrated ensemble, imbalance handling is unnecessary.
It is shown that the Gelman-Pardoe pooling factor and structural leverage predict these folds from model structure and group sizes, without forming importance weights, from model structure and group sizes, without forming importance weights.
OBJECTIVE
Selective classification improves reliability by allowing models to abstain on uncertain inputs, which is critical in safety-sensitive domains such as healthcare. However, commonly used evaluation metrics obscure fairness issues under class imbalance, leading to disproportionately high rejection of minority c...
Fatih Sağlam, Ünsal Özgen, Alper Uygun et al.· Journal of Biomedical Inform...· 0 citations
It is proved that unlabelled scores alone cannot determine whether switching to the margin will help, and more accurate models pass the same check, showing that the limit is regime-specific.
Zhao-Yang Jiang, Zhizhong Fu, Yunsoo Kim et al.· 0 citations
CLEAR (Class-wise reLiability-aware Expert Aggregation for long-tailed Recognition), a modular ensemble framework for long-tailed classification, generates diverse experts through threshold-based structured sampling while preserving the full label space, then estimates a class-wise trust score for each expert using a s...
Gawon Lim· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.