Skip to content
Case report Open access

Machine Learning and Liquidity Dynamics in European Stock Markets

Jul 2026 · CESifo working papers · 0 citations

TL;DR

SHAP analysis reveals that trading activity, lagged liquidity, and market uncertainty are the main determinants of liquidity forecasts, and the findings highlight the complementary role of explainable machine learning in empirical finance.

Abstract

This paper examines the forecasting of liquidity dynamics in European stock markets by means of traditional econometric models and machine learning techniques. It uses daily data for the DAX, CAC 40, FTSE 100, FTSE MIB, and IBEX 35 over 2010–2026, liquidity being measured by the logarithmic Amihud illiquidity indicator. The empirical framework compares ARIMA models and a dynamic panel specification with Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Support Vector Regression (SVR) within a common rolling one-step-ahead forecasting framework. The results show that liquidity is highly persistent and that the dynamic panel model achieves the lowest forecast errors, although Diebold–Mariano tests indicate no significant predictive advantage over the leading machine learning models. SHAP analysis reveals that trading activity, lagged liquidity, and market uncertainty are the main determinants of liquidity forecasts. The findings highlight the complementary role of explainable machine learning in empirical finance.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Jul 2026

Volatility Forecasting—Machine Learning or Econometric Model?

This paper utilises high‐frequency data from the Chinese stock market and a panel of individual stocks to compare the forecasting performance of machine learning with popular econometric models across different periods and indicates that over a longer forecasting horizon, this method achieves the best performance among...

Hua Zhao, C. Hsiao, Leran Liu · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Structural drivers and forecasting dynamics of the BIST100 index: a hybrid ML/DL approach integrating liquidity, sentiment and macroeconomic factors

The results show that both ML and DL models provide strong forecasting performance for the BIST100 Index, and suggest that BIST100 dynamics are shaped by the joint influence of economic fundamentals, market sentiment and liquidity conditions.

Alptekin Erdağ, M. F. Uçar, İ. Tarhan · 0 citations
Preprint Jul 2026

Yield Curve Prediction with Machine Learning: Forecasting Approaches and the Role of Macroeconomic Predictors

Direct-yield models perform best for slope forecasts and are relatively stronger at short horizons, while factor-based models become more competitive at longer horizons, while macroeconomic predictors provide clear incremental predictive power, strongest for slope-related movements.

Jeron Tan Kang · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Forecasting Weekly S&P 500 Returns Using Machine Learning: Evidence from Technical and Volume-Based Indicators

Examination of the predictability of weekly S&P 500 returns using traditional market-based indicators combined with modern machine learning methods indicates that adaptive learning approaches can reveal meaningful short-term market dynamics.

George Chang, Esther Ochieng · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.