Robust hedging valuation adjustment (HVA) is applied as a post-training valuation-adjustment layer that evaluates tracking-loss CVaR together with explicit funding and margin add-ons together with explicit funding and margin add-ons.
Abstract
Hedging a derivative position under transaction costs and market frictions requires a trading rule that adapts to changing conditions. Deep hedging trains a neural policy for this task but policy training does not determine whether a trading desk can afford to run the policy. We apply robust hedging valuation adjustment (HVA) as a post-training valuation-adjustment layer that evaluates tracking-loss CVaR together with explicit funding and margin add-ons. The funding and margin add-ons share the same KL uncertainty set as HVA. For each policy, a single common-stress tilt computes HVA, funding and margin jointly and a trading desk can get one internally consistent reserve instead of the three separately. We compare classical hedge policies with learned hedge specifications across three market environments with different liquidity. No single specification dominates in every market. Under the strict tracking-risk budget, gamma-wide classical bands are selected in High and Middle Liquidity while sparse learned execution is selected in Low Liquidity. At looser validation budgets wider classical bands are generally selected.
Classical put-overlays have long been treated as a reliable hedge against tail risk but the market conditions of 2025 expose their limits in ways that theory didn’t fully anticipate. This paper examines where these strategies break down: in markets defined by elevated volatility, wide bid-ask spreads, and structural fr...
Y. Chakrabarti· American Journal of Financia...· 0 citations
Forward-looking volatility forecasts are central inputs to derivatives pricing, market making, risk management, and volatility-linked trading strategies, with ARCH and GARCH models serving as the canonical workhorses. Such models are natural in standard asset markets, where prices are positive-valued stochastic process...
Weiye Xi, C. Moallemi, Mallesh M. Pai et al.· 0 citations
Bitcoin option prices reflect terminal variance and the cost of managing convex exposure in a market with changing depth and execution quality. This paper asks whether a liquidity state can be separated from fractional rough volatility in Bitcoin option valuation. The contribution is a modelling combination: standard s...
Classical portfolio theory frequently assumes frictionless markets, but in reality, transaction costs, like fees and market impact, can erode returns and cause excessive turnover. Incorporating these costs transforms rebalancing from a mechanical rule into a strategic decision: determining exactly when and how much to...
The framework of loss-versus-rebalancing (LVR) is used to study how the total worst-case loss to the subsidizer is distributed across price states or over time and extended to dynamic liquidity management, showing that liquidity levels can be adjusted over time to implement a prescribed target expected cumulative loss...
C. Moallemi, D. Robinson, Brian Z. Zhu· 0 citations
We develop a continuous-time equilibrium model of futures markets in which heterogeneous hedgers and speculators trade under explicit margin constraints. Agents maximize exponential utility and take prices as given, while the equilibrium futures drift is determined endogenously through market clearing. Margin frictions...
Ryle S. Perera· International Game Theory Re...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.